Skip to content

FutureX

My feedback

21 results found

  1. 42 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    FutureX commented  · 

    Just had a reseller client ask this exact question.

    They are bringing on another developer who needs access to their entire reseller account but we're limited to only one admin?

    FutureX supported this idea  · 
  2. 169 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    FutureX supported this idea  · 
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    FutureX commented  · 

    Is this a joke? This makes no sense that this problem persists!

    That means we can't sell 'email only' accounts?!

  3. 25 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  4. 3 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  5. 385 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    FutureX supported this idea  · 
  6. 536 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    FutureX supported this idea  · 
  7. 127 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    FutureX commented  · 

    This is tied in with being able to assign a 'No hosting' type to all domains. Right now the Main domain has to be of type 'Website' if you have multiple domains.

    And if you have a single domain set to 'No hosting' you can't add any more domains.

    What if a client only purchases domain names and no hosting? They still need DNS access.

    Then later on that customer decides to purchase hosting and it converts to a 'Website' type.

    FutureX supported this idea  · 
  8. 34 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Many providers set a placeholder domain as the main subscription domain so that all domains actually "in use" in a subscription can be freely configured. Please consider this option as it will immediately solve the issue for you.


    Besides that, this is a valid request. Everyone, please keep voting for it if you believe it is important.

    -- PD

    An error occurred while saving the comment
    FutureX commented  · 

    And also add the ability to select 'No hosting' option as well. Gives the customer DNS access to their domains without purchasing a hosting package.

    8 years?? really? Seems like such a simple feature to implement.

    FutureX supported this idea  · 
  9. 2 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    FutureX supported this idea  · 
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    FutureX commented  · 

    Very important to be able to create a service plan that is a "Domain Only" plan. Right now you can not do this.

  10. 1 vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  11. 56 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    FutureX supported this idea  · 
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    FutureX commented  · 

    I fully agree. Virtually all major web hosting companies offer WP-CLI access for 'each' user not just on a root level. I love that Plesk as the WP-CLI built in, that is very forward thinking. Now it just needs to be accessible to users with out giving them root access.

  12. 3 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    FutureX commented  · 

    I just finally tracked down why ahrefs was getting a 403 "Forbidden" error when their bot tried to scan my site. It was the "Enable bot protection" security setting. Once I disabled that it was fine but would be nice to whitelist either their IPs or user agents.

    FutureX supported this idea  · 
  13. 6 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    open discussion  ·  IgorG responded

    Thank you for your input. We will consider this functionality in upcoming releases if it is popular. Everyone, please continue voting for this feature if you consider it important.

    IG

    FutureX supported this idea  · 
  14. 15 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    FutureX supported this idea  · 
  15. 4 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    FutureX supported this idea  · 
  16. 6 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    FutureX supported this idea  · 
  17. 16 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    FutureX supported this idea  · 
  18. 64 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    FutureX supported this idea  · 
  19. 3 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    FutureX shared this idea  · 
  20. 69 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    FutureX commented  · 

    I agree, 1 user could run rampant with small files and use up all the inodes.

← Previous 1

Feedback and Knowledge Base