Kirill Nikolaev
My feedback
19 results found
-
18 votes
In the nearest future, we plan to stop shipping MyLittleAdmin with Plesk. This is because MyLittleAdmin is not in active development, and has known security issues. Instead, Plesk will provide links to downloadable clients and instructions on how to connect the client to the Plesk server. This change is currently scheduled to take place with the release of Plesk Obsidian 18.0.53 (early June 2023).
-- PD
Kirill Nikolaev supported this idea ·
-
3 votes
Kirill Nikolaev supported this idea ·
-
2 votes
This is a valid request, so we’ll look into it. There is no ETA at the moment, but we would really appreciate you voting for this request so that we can accurately assess its popularity relative to other features. Thanks in advance!
— rk
Kirill Nikolaev supported this idea ·
-
3 votes
Thank you for your input! We will consider this functionality in upcoming releases if it will be popular. Everyone, please continue voting for this feature if you consider it important.
—
IGKirill Nikolaev supported this idea ·
-
356 votes
Thank you for your input! We will consider this functionality in upcoming releases if it will be popular.
Everyone, please continue voting for this feature if you consider it important.
— AY
Kirill Nikolaev supported this idea ·
-
582 votes
Thank you for your input! We will consider this functionality in upcoming releases if it will be popular.
Everyone, please continue voting for this feature if you consider it important.
—
IGKirill Nikolaev supported this idea ·
-
4 votes
AFAIU, the request is about right ciphers for SSL configuration. We have a documentation how to do it manually: https://docs.plesk.com/en-US/onyx/administrator-guide/plesk-administration/securing-plesk/pci-dss-compliance/tune-plesk-to-meet-pci-dss-on-windows.78901/ but have no tool to do it automatically, so, this is a valid request, we’ll look into it.
There is no ETA at the moment, but we would really appreciate you voting for this request so that we can accurately assess its popularity relative to other features. Thanks in advance!
— rk
Kirill Nikolaev supported this idea ·
-
6 votes
Thank you for your input! We will consider this functionality in upcoming releases if it will be popular.
Everyone, please continue voting for this feature if you consider it important.—
IGKirill Nikolaev supported this idea ·
-
5 votes
Kirill Nikolaev supported this idea ·
-
7 votes
Thank you for your input! We will consider this functionality in upcoming releases if it will be popular.
Everyone, please continue voting for this feature if you consider it important.
— SUKirill Nikolaev supported this idea ·
-
83 votes
Thank you for your input! We will consider this functionality in upcoming releases if it will be popular.
Everyone, please continue voting for this feature if you consider it important.— rk
Kirill Nikolaev supported this idea ·
-
73 votes
Kirill Nikolaev supported this idea ·
-
142 votes
Thank you for your input! We will consider this functionality in upcoming releases if it will be popular.
Everyone, please continue voting for this feature if you consider it important.
—
ETKirill Nikolaev supported this idea ·
-
127 votes
Kirill Nikolaev supported this idea ·
-
221 votes
Thank you for your input. We will explore the possibility of implementing YubiKey in upcoming releases.
Kirill Nikolaev supported this idea ·
-
510 votes
Kirill Nikolaev supported this idea ·
-
556 votes
We have serious doubts this function can really increase server security:
1) Plesk has built-in protection against brute-force on login – it will lock the login form. So no one can try multiple attempts
2) Arbitrary login name adds very little guess-complexity to a proper password. If you have concerns for your login brute-forced – add another 5-7 characters into your password and feel safe.As changed login name is still very likely to be some sort of vocabulary word or derived from your other account name – this function would only give a false sense of better security. Your security strength is in complex password, not in a complex login name. If you have one good password, you don’t need to treat login as your “second password” – one good password is enough.
As for concerns that default password requirement is set in “weak”, that fail2ban module is not…
Kirill Nikolaev supported this idea ·
-
1,219 votes
Kirill Nikolaev supported this idea ·
-
36 votes
Thank you for your input! We will consider this functionality in upcoming releases if it will be popular.
Everyone, please continue voting for this feature if you consider it important.— rk
Kirill Nikolaev supported this idea ·