Aokalter
My feedback
70 results found
-
4 votes
Thank you for your input! We will consider this functionality in upcoming releases if it will be popular.
Everyone, please continue voting for this feature if you consider it important.
—
IGAokalter
supported this idea
·
-
26 votesAokalter
supported this idea
·
-
14 votes
Thank you for your input! We will consider this functionality in upcoming releases if it will be popular.
Everyone, please continue voting for this feature if you consider it important.
—
IGAokalter
supported this idea
·
-
21 votes
With a market share of 0.22 % in servers, Tomcat can clearly not be considered the "most run middleware on the planet". This feature request has only received 12 votes during 4 years, which is another hint that this is not so popular among users. Tomcat has had a low demand before support was dropped many years ago, too. It also does not help the case to insult staff. Instead, we will continue to focus on supporting popular technologies. Should Tomcat become popular again among users, we'll gladly pick the idea up again.
You can vote on this feature if you believe it is important.
-- PD
-----
Have you seen the reasons why Tomcat support was dropped in Plesk https://support.plesk.com/hc/en-us/articles/115005115774-Deprecated-functionality-in-Plesk-Onyx-17-8#Tomcat ? -- IG
Aokalter
supported this idea
·
-
26 votes
This is a valid request, for example when a provider does not want to offer free certificates to some customers. We will consider this functionality in upcoming releases if it will be popular.
Everyone, please continue voting for this feature if you consider it important.
-- PD
Aokalter
supported this idea
·
-
13 votes
Thank you for your input! We will consider this functionality in upcoming releases if it will be popular.
Everyone, please continue voting for this feature if you consider it important.
—
IGAokalter
supported this idea
·
-
15 votes
Thank you for your input! We will consider this functionality in upcoming releases if it will be popular.
Everyone, please continue voting for this feature if you consider it important.
—
IGAokalter
supported this idea
·
-
18 votes
Thank you for your input! We will consider this functionality in upcoming releases if it will be popular.
Everyone, please continue voting for this feature if you consider it important.
—
IGAokalter
supported this idea
·
-
20 votes
Thanks for submitting this suggestion. It definitely looks useful, so we’ll consider adding it in upcoming Plesk / WPT updates.
Everyone, please continue to vote for this feature so we could evaluate its popularity.
—AK
Aokalter
supported this idea
·
-
23 votes
Thank you for your input! We will consider this functionality in upcoming releases, if it will be popular.
Everyone, please continue voting for this feature if you consider it important.
—
ETAokalter
supported this idea
·
-
27 votes
This is a valid request, so we’ll look into it. There is no ETA at the moment, but we would really appreciate you voting for this request so that we can accurately assess its popularity relative to other features. Thanks in advance!
— rk
Aokalter
supported this idea
·
-
58 votes
This is a valid request, so we’ll look into it. There is no ETA at the moment, but we would really appreciate you voting for this request so that we can accurately assess its popularity relative to other features. Thanks in advance!
— rk
Aokalter
supported this idea
·
-
49 votes
These suggestions look quite reasonable. We encourage other WPT users to join and let us know what other security improvements you’d like us to implement in WPT.
—AK
Aokalter
supported this idea
·
-
26 votesAokalter
supported this idea
·
-
97 votes
Thank you for your input! We will consider this functionality in upcoming releases if it will be popular.
Everyone, please continue voting for this feature if you consider it important.
—
IGAokalter
supported this idea
·
-
38 votes
This feature has not gotten many votes during the past five years. Technically, a graceful restart of Apache is unnoticeable for the user as not service interruption occurs. Further, Apaches model loads all configuration data into memory upon start or reload. The Odin link provided in the comments does not lead to a more details explanation of the feature request. And finally, in the Nginx/Apache combination with an increasing number of users considering Nginx-only hosting a change in the Apache worker process won't be sufficient.
Please provide a sound explanation why a graceful restart of web servers is insufficient for adding or modifying web server configuration.
-- PD
Aokalter
supported this idea
·
-
125 votes
Thank you for your input! We will consider this functionality in upcoming releases if it will be popular.
Everyone, please continue voting for this feature if you consider it important.
—
IGAokalter
supported this idea
·
-
56 votesAokalter
supported this idea
·
-
99 votesAokalter
supported this idea
·
-
185 votes
Thank you for your input! We will consider this functionality in upcoming releases if it will be popular.
Everyone, please continue voting for this feature if you consider it important.
—
IGAokalter
supported this idea
·
