John Cocula
My feedback
1 result found
-
59 votes
Thanks for your feature request. We will definitely consider the possibility of its implementation if it receives a significant number of votes and is in demand.
—
IGAn error occurred while saving the comment An error occurred while saving the comment John Cocula commentedIn Plesk, Fail2ban has a UI to change its configuration, and if the same existed for CrowdSec, then it would become a commonly used component among Plesk users, who would find its advantages over Fail2ban very worthwhile. So if you were to implement an extension for CrowdSec, you would certainly find lots of adopters.
John Cocula supported this idea ·
Provide a choice to the Plesk user of either Fail2ban or CrowdSec, and add a UI to CrowdSec that provides similar ease of use to that already present for Fail2ban. Pre-configure which logs are scanned and allow choice of bouncers or adding new bouncers from different sources. While one can manually grope around to figure out how to replace all that Fail2ban currently does with CrowdSec, it would be so much better to have a "snap in" replacement.