Skip to content

Lucien Schuenke

My feedback

1 result found

  1. 9 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Lucien Schuenke commented  · 


    Sure can do!

    > Could you please be more specific? What is desired usage scenario?
    In the case of small to larger corporations, the focus goes always further into the direction of SSO, thus it would be beneficial for Plesk to also account for further growth in this security-related sector. This methodology of only having 1 Login to allow users to actually remember a password and have sufficient two factor or even more, is a good advantage in future proving.

    > What are expected benefits of this feature in comparison with other already implemented social login methods?
    I would argue, that allowing multiple authentication methods would allow a higher access rate of users. Also instead of having 1 extension for Google etc. and then another for just LDAP, why can't you create one extension allowing for example:
    LDAP, OAuthv2(likely what you are using for google etc.)

    And then let the customer make the implementation for each, this way I could for example use Azure AD using OAuth, even tho you technically didn't account for it, but wrote code to support your Google, Facebook etc. login. I think the SSL It! was a great success and could be an example of bringing extensions together into one product to provide even better solutions. ( easier to implement and control for example )

Feedback and Knowledge Base