Skip to content

Feature Suggestions

← Your Ideas for Plesk

Please provide here your suggestion for new functionality for Plesk. We encourage you to review and vote for suggestions of others. The top-ranked suggestions are likely to be included in the next versions of Plesk.

Please write in English so that voters from all over the world can read and support your request.

For technical assistance, contact Plesk support
For questions, bug reports, discussions and free assistance, check our Forum and Facebook page
For additional information, see Documentation, Knowledge Base and Blog
Follow us on Twitter for more news on Plesk development

Off-topic posts will be removed from here

I suggest you...

(thinking…)

Enter your idea and we'll search to see if someone has already suggested it.

If a similar idea already exists, you can support and comment on it.

If it doesn't exist, you can post your idea so others can support it.

Enter your idea and we'll search to see if someone has already suggested it.

  • Hot ideas
  • Top ideas
  • New ideas
  • My feedback

146 results found

  1. limit socket connections in php

    Limit socket connections (per hour / minute) of php to fight abuse / ddos

    3 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Close
    Close

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    1 comment  ·  Security  ·  Admin →

  2. Fail2ban: ability for global setting to have mail alert feature

    In Plesk 12 current settings of Plesk fail2ban manager has not the ability to set globally a action for blocking and mail alerts.

    At this time you have to add a action sendmail... for every jail!

    Adding a macro like:

    banaction = iptables-multiport
    action_ = %(banaction)s[name=%(name)s, port="%(port)s", protocol="%(protocol)s", chain="%(chain)s"]
    actionmw = %(banaction)s[name=%(name)s, port="%(port)s", protocol="%(protocol)s", chain="%(chain)s"]
    %(mta)s-whois[name=%(    name)s, dest="%(destemail)s", protocol="%(protocol)s", chain="%(chain)s"]
    action    mwl = %(banaction)s[name=%(name)s, port="%(port)s", protocol="%(protocol)s", chain="%(chain)s"]
    %(mta)s-whois-lines[name=%(name)s, dest="%(destemail)s", logpath=%(logpath)s, chain="%(chain)s"
    action =%(action_mwl)s

    does not work properly and easy!
    And needs much manual configuration in /etc/fail2ban

    Please add teh ability…

    3 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Close
    Close

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Security  ·  Admin →

  3. allow to add hostname/dynamic IP´s in firewallrules

    allow to add hostnames and dynamic IP´s in firewallrules
    allow to set IP range

    2 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Close
    Close

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Security  ·  Admin →

  4. Firewall rules with IP Fields... It's Basic

    See Windows server 2008 Firewall to see examples to separate in and ougoing trafic.
    And I'm agree to others posts to import rules about blacklists from specialized sites

    2 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Close
    Close

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Security  ·  Admin →

  5. Fail to ban - remove blocked IPs

    Make remove blocked IPs easy via n new gui button

    0 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Close
    Close

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Security  ·  Admin →

  6. In the "outgoing mail control" module, add the option to block for one or more ip addresses

    In the "outgoing mail control" module, add the option to block smtp for one or more ip addresses

    0 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Close
    Close

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Security  ·  Admin →
    declined  ·  IgorG responded

    Thank you for your input!
    Unfortunately, we have to close your request, because over the years it has not become quite popular for further implementation.
    —
    IG

1 2 3 4 5 6 8 Next →
  • Don't see your idea?

Feature Suggestions

Categories

Feedback and Knowledge Base

(thinking…)