Skip to content

Reinier Post, TU Eindhoven

My feedback

5 results found

  1. 1 vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Feature Suggestions » API  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Reinier Post, TU Eindhoven shared this idea  · 
  2. 4 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Reinier Post, TU Eindhoven supported this idea  · 
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Reinier Post, TU Eindhoven commented  · 

    I want this, too. We are a reseller and we use the XML API.

  3. 6 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Reinier Post, TU Eindhoven commented  · 

    I would like to have this, too. The issue for us is that we like to keep sync all (of our 471) subscriptions in sync so we know they conform to the assigned service plan and addons. This is not possible with subscriptions of type forwarding.

    I suppose we could avoid this by creating all forwarding domains as additional domains to existing subscriptions, but sometimes, forwarding is all that is being done for a customer, so this would be nice to have.

  4. 15 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    open discussion  ·  IgorG responded

    Thank you for your input. We will consider this functionality in upcoming releases if it is popular. Everyone, please continue voting for this feature if you consider it important.

    IG

    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Reinier Post, TU Eindhoven commented  · 

    Plesk now has an extension for this purpose (SSL It! : https://www.plesk.com/extensions/sslit/), but thus far it only supports Sectigo. We just switched from Sectigo to HARICA.

  5. 4 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Reinier Post, TU Eindhoven commented  · 

    More specifically, we want modern authentication rather than LDAP-based authentication because the latter is less secure (user credentials are sent to the Plesk server, which we don't want to happen for Single Sign-On accounts).

    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Reinier Post, TU Eindhoven commented  · 

    We've been wanting this for at least a decade. It is pretty important.

    At our university, we have a security policy to tie IT resources to central (Microsoft) accounts so they become automatically inaccessible when an account is disabled or removed. This will ease lifecycle management on Plesk customers and sites.

    Reinier Post, TU Eindhoven supported this idea  · 

Feedback and Knowledge Base