Phi Nguyen
My feedback
4 results found
-
1,580 votes
We hear you and see a clear demand for this feature.
I want to say that implementing these features requires a lot of investment, and in 2021 Plesk team keeps focusing on the delivery of other improvements (sad, but true).
We will back to the re-evaluation of these features at the beginning of the next year.
Please continue to share your use cases and requirements, and it would really helpful if you point to existing solutions that we can review and check before implementation.
Your feedback is important to us. Thank you, everyone.
—
AAAn error occurred while saving the comment Phi Nguyen supported this idea ·
-
24 votes
Thank you for your input. We will consider adding this functionality in the future releases.
—AK
Phi Nguyen supported this idea ·
-
543 votes
Thank you for your input! We will consider this functionality in upcoming releases if it will be popular.
Everyone, please continue voting for this feature if you consider it important.
—
IGAn error occurred while saving the comment Phi Nguyen commented
like!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Phi Nguyen supported this idea ·
-
64 votes
Thank you for your input! We will consider this functionality in upcoming releases if it will be popular.
Everyone, please continue voting for this feature if you consider it important.
— SUAn error occurred while saving the comment Phi Nguyen commented
I realize the limit inode for customers feature is needed!
Phi Nguyen supported this idea ·
Any news about the Plesk feature request for HA (High Availability) Cluster and LB (Load Balancing) Cluster ?