Skip to content

analyzer

My feedback

1 result found

  1. 1,303 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    analyzer commented  · 

    @thomas: and how about e.g. postfix? apache? etc.?

    However, issuers of alternative proprietary payable services should strive to make their products "better" than their OS "competition", enough to justify licensing it.

    And Plesk should provide more sophisticated/flexible integration with more options per user. From what I saw last time when I checked it, Alleged sender addresses are notified about each detected malware sent in their name??? Honestly??? And then there's no quarantineing (they could e.g. create and use a mailbox subfolder for that, accessible for release by the user itself anytime, just as they do with spam together with assassin). And then it's all about mail's content only, hyperlinks are not scanned. As long as such design flaws persist, then I'm not going to provide AV to the users on my plesked systems. Not even ClamAV, if it'd have the same flaws there.

    Users need to think before clicking/opening anyway, even if any AV is enabled for assistance, be it locally or anywhere in the network.

Feedback and Knowledge Base