Anonymous
My feedback
2 results found
-
2 votes
This is a valid request, so we'll look into it. There is no ETA at the moment, but we would really appreciate you voting for this request so that we can accurately assess its popularity relative to other features.
Thanks in advance!
--
IG
-
7 votes
Thank you for your input! We will consider this functionality in upcoming releases, if it will be popular.
Everyone, please continue voting for this feature if you consider it important.—
IGAnonymous supported this idea ·An error occurred while saving the comment
Hi,
We have the same problem. If customers must pay a quantity of money for 20 Gb transfer, we can't take into consideration the GB used internally by the server as "cache", like mod_pagespeed do.
We have had a problem with this, because we have subscriptions with 20 GB limit, with 19 Gb of them result of cache by page_speed.
Please, not consider loopback traffic as traffic to be counted!