Skip to content

Feature Suggestions

Please provide here your suggestion for new functionality for Plesk. We encourage you to review and vote for suggestions of others. The top-ranked suggestions are likely to be included in the next versions of Plesk.

Please write in English so that voters from all over the world can read and support your request.

For technical assistance, contact Plesk support
For questions, bug reports, discussions and free assistance, check our Forum and Facebook page
For additional information, see Documentation, Knowledge Base and Blog
Follow us on Twitter for more news on Plesk development

Off-topic posts will be removed from here

  • Hot ideas
  • Top ideas
  • New ideas
  • My feedback

45 results found

  1. Making configuring nameservers easier (Like in cPanel and DirectAdmin)

    Make it easier for panel owners to create nameservers, by just filling in what nameservers you want and let the panel do the rest.

    1 vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  DNS  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  2. Make customising DNS/MX records far clearer and easier!

    New to Plesk. Understanding how to set up previously existing DNS customisations on a per domain level is next to impossible! Quite frustrating that something so basic is either hidden away in some obscure place or does not exist at all. The interface needs to be far more intuitive. Perhaps have a "simple view" view and a "full view" option, so we can use all the bells and whistles if we need/want to, but can avoid the distraction is we don't.

    5 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    4 comments  ·  DNS  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  3. Restoring the default values for DNS + DomainKey

    When you make a restore of the default values for the DNS for a domain, it is verry annoying that some special DNS records are erased in the same time. Exemple the code for DOmainKey that need to go back in the mail setting, disable and re-enable this fonction at each time.

    6 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  DNS  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  4. Show DNS explicitly for users

    As a new user in Parallels (the Locaweb), I not found the DNS value to insert into Registro.br (brazilian domain's register), so I guess this information, DNS mine, should be explicitly shown to me ... Because I had to call the Locaweb to question them.

    3 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  DNS  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  5. add an SPF record to the DNS template

    SPF information is so far entered through the TXT record. Adding the emerging new SPF record would make sense.

    45 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    5 comments  ·  DNS  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Thank you for your input! We do not plan for adding support of SPF record as a resource record (RR).

    [...]
    3.1.  DNS Resource Records
       SPF records MUST be published as a DNS TXT (type 16) Resource Record
       (RR) [RFC1035] only.  The character content of the record is encoded
       as [US-ASCII].  Use of alternative DNS RR types was supported in
       SPF's experimental phase but has been discontinued.
    [...] 

    Additional information can be obtained by link https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc7208#section-3.1

    — AY

1 3 Next →
  • Don't see your idea?

Feedback and Knowledge Base