Niek Beernink

My feedback

  1. 62 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    9 comments  ·  Feature Suggestions » Business Logic  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Niek Beernink supported this idea  · 
  2. 12 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    2 comments  ·  Feature Suggestions » Usability and UI  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Niek Beernink supported this idea  · 
    Niek Beernink commented  · 

    This is currently a problem for us as well. One or the other, not both please.

  3. 41 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    open discussion  ·  7 comments  ·  Feature Suggestions » Plesk (general)  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Niek Beernink commented  · 

    I completely agree with this feature request. The firewall extension could be updated to allow setting these types of rules, currently it's too simplistic and things like gid-owner and uid-owner can't be set via the Plesk interface.

    In reply to Plesk staf; The outbound antispam features are surely useful, however they only limit the number of mails sent through postfix. It doesn't protect against what Tozz is describing, and I actually found this feature request searching for a way to limit SMTP traffic only to users that should be allowed to mail. The spamscript I killed was sending mail outside of postfix so nothing was being logged and limited via the outbound antispam solution. Pretty nasty.

    Niek Beernink supported this idea  · 

Feedback and Knowledge Base