Robin
My feedback
11 results found
-
21 votes
Thank you for your input! We will consider this functionality in upcoming releases if it will be popular.
Everyone, please continue voting for this feature if you consider it important.
— rk
An error occurred while saving the comment An error occurred while saving the comment Robin commented
I'm trying to actually use Plesk's Git extension in prod for the first time and I find it's absolutely useless as it doesn't support this feature.
Using a dev / master branch is the very basic of Git.
Please support this feature ASAP.Robin supported this idea ·
-
45 votes
Robin supported this idea ·
-
5 votes
Thank you for your input! We will consider this functionality in upcoming releases if it will be popular.
Everyone, please continue voting for this feature if you consider it important.
—
IGAn error occurred while saving the comment Robin commented
This KB article talks about Plesk's limitation here:
https://support.plesk.com/hc/en-us/articles/360014490834-How-to-change-default-charset-from-utf8-unicode-ci-to-utf8mb4-unicode-ci-in-MySQL-in-Plesk-for-Linux-By defaults, collation is "utf8" which is "utf8bm3" which is very very obsolete.
Plesk should now use utf8mb4_unicode_ci at least, or utf8mb4_unicode_520_ci when supported.Robin supported this idea ·
-
378 votes
As UserVoice staff cleaned up the most of twisted voices, I’ve returning this suggestion to open discussion.
Everyone, please continue voting for this feature if you consider it important.
—IB
Robin supported this idea ·
-
556 votes
We have serious doubts this function can really increase server security:
1) Plesk has built-in protection against brute-force on login – it will lock the login form. So no one can try multiple attempts
2) Arbitrary login name adds very little guess-complexity to a proper password. If you have concerns for your login brute-forced – add another 5-7 characters into your password and feel safe.As changed login name is still very likely to be some sort of vocabulary word or derived from your other account name – this function would only give a false sense of better security. Your security strength is in complex password, not in a complex login name. If you have one good password, you don’t need to treat login as your “second password” – one good password is enough.
As for concerns that default password requirement is set in “weak”, that fail2ban module is not…
Robin supported this idea ·
-
69 votes
Robin supported this idea ·
-
127 votes
Thank you for your input! We will consider this functionality in upcoming releases if it will be popular.
Everyone, please continue voting for this feature if you consider it important.— rk
An error occurred while saving the comment Robin commented
Feature is much needed. We need to be able to secure a webmail even when the domain is not hosted on the server, or when the web hosting is disabled. We need as well, in Obsidian, to be able to generate an email server only certificate.
This request is quite related to https://plesk.uservoice.com/forums/184549-feature-suggestions/suggestions/18989752-ssl-cert-for-a-domain-frame-forwarder
If you allow generating a certificate for frame forwarder domains, then it should resolve this issue as well.Plesk, we're not in 1999, SSL/TLS should be anywhere, whenever possible... We're paying premium, then please, serve premium service.
Robin supported this idea ·
-
23 votes
This is a valid request, for example when a provider does not want to offer free certificates to some customers. We will consider this functionality in upcoming releases if it will be popular.
Everyone, please continue voting for this feature if you consider it important.
-- PD
Robin supported this idea ·
-
42 votes
Robin supported this idea ·
-
18 votes
Thank you for your input. We will consider this functionality in upcoming releases, if it will be popular.
Everyone, please continue voting for this feature if you consider it important.Robin supported this idea ·
-
12 votes
Thank you for your input! We will consider this functionality in upcoming releases if it will be popular.
Everyone, please continue voting for this feature if you consider it important.
—
IGRobin shared this idea ·
Workaround: Add the repo a second time, change "Repository name" (otherwise it will tell you it already exists), change branch, change deploy path. Done.