Daniel Hendricks
My feedback
-
307 votesopen discussion · 44 comments · Feature Suggestions » Security · Flag idea as inappropriate… · Admin →Daniel Hendricks
supported this idea
·
-
385 votes
Let’s Encrypt 2.1.0 extension with Webmail support is now available!
https://ext.plesk.com/packages/f6847e61-33a7-4104-8dc9-d26a0183a8dd-letsencrypt
We would love to hear your feedback on our forum at http://talk.plesk.com. We’d like to thank everyone who commented on this request and provided invaluable feedback. Thanks!
PS: about Mailserver support – we have it in our plans.
Daniel Hendricks
supported this idea
·
-
20 votes
Thank you for your input! We will consider this functionality in upcoming releases if it will be popular.
Everyone, please continue voting for this feature if you consider it important.
— rk
Daniel Hendricks
commented
That is correct. Without hacking the SIAB code and/or setting up some SSO, it would just be a web-based version of SSH, requiring that port to be open publicly.
Daniel Hendricks
commented
I know that it needs work, but you can accomplish similar with a Shell in a Box Docker container and a simple extension:
https://github.com/cloudverve/plesk-terminal-icon-ext#screenshots
Daniel Hendricks
supported this idea
·
-
56 votes
Thank you for your input! We will consider this functionality in upcoming releases, if it will be popular.
Everyone, please continue voting for this feature if you consider it important.
—
IGDaniel Hendricks
commented
It's buried in the KB articles: https://support.plesk.com/hc/en-us/articles/213406329-How-to-suggest-a-feature-request-for-Plesk-
There have been several support techs that recommended it to me (whether appropriately or inappropriately) via support tickets.
I agree that it would make sense if they link it in the footer or on the Help Center page. Maybe we should make a Feature Suggestion. ;)
Daniel Hendricks
supported this idea
·
-
45 votes
Thank you for your input!
You mean “Local repository on your workstation” mode (not “Remote Git hosting like GitHub or BitBucket”), right?
Everyone, please continue voting for this feature if you consider it important.
— rk
Daniel Hendricks
supported this idea
·
-
3 votes
Thank you for your input! We will consider this functionality in upcoming releases, if it will be popular.
Everyone, please continue voting for this feature if you consider it important.
__
IGDaniel Hendricks
commented
I'm not sure how this ended up in the new Docker category, but would you please move it to Databases (or whichever category that you feel is most relevant)? Thank you, Daniel.
Daniel Hendricks
shared this idea
·
-
45 votes
Thank you for your input! We will consider this functionality in upcoming releases if it will be popular.
Everyone, please continue voting for this feature if you consider it important.— rk
Daniel Hendricks
supported this idea
·
-
2 votesDaniel Hendricks
commented
Plesk already allows you to connect to MySQL databases remotely.
-
2 votesDaniel Hendricks
supported this idea
·
-
1,062 votes
Hi everyone, we’re working on UI for this feature and we would like to kindly ask you to answer one more short survey for better understanding your needs and priorities :) your answers are very important, thank you in advance!
https://pleskteam.typeform.com/to/r7WjG8
— ZB
Daniel Hendricks
supported this idea
·
-
73 votes
Thank you for your input! We will consider this functionality in upcoming releases if it will be popular.
Everyone, please continue voting for this feature if you consider it important.
— AY
Daniel Hendricks
commented
Agree - Brotli is used by many CDN providers and it would be nice to have this managed by Plesk rather than doing a custom compile (I prefer to keep things OEM, when possible, to avoid conflicts).
Daniel Hendricks
supported this idea
·
-
4 votesmore input required ·
AdminSergey L
(Director of Program Management, Plesk International GmbH)
responded
Can you share how GoAccess is more valuable for you than, for example, Google Analytics or similar service?
Daniel Hendricks
commented
FWIW, I did get this to (sort of) work with the Docker image: allinurl/goaccess
Caveats:
- HTML-only. No command-line use.
- I got an HTTP 400 error when I tried to visit the exposed port.
- The official image requires a configuration file which required some messing around. I could not find a maintained image that worked strictly by passing environmental variables.
- It appears that GoAccess only lets you specify one log file (?), so I had to choose between access_log and access_ssl_log (this wasn't a big deal for me since all of my traffic is HTTPS).HOWEVER, I did get the HTML output stats to work. What I had to do:
1. I created the following directories and chown'd permissions to the user:
[path_to_web_site_root]/docker/goaccess (I put all of my persistent Docker app data under /docker/[app_name]. YMMV.)
[path_to_web_site_root]/httpdocs/goaccess (or wherever you want the reports generated)2. Pull the Docker image in Plesk and add new container. It seems to be working with a 256MB memory limit.
3. I turned off automatic port mapping and chose my next available port (sort of irrelevant since I got the 400 error, however, I gave it a port to avoid collisions).
4. I mapped the following volumes:/srv/data => [path_to_web_site_root]/docker/goaccess
/srv/report => [path_to_web_site_root]/httpdocs/goaccess
/srv/logs => [path_to_web_site_root]/logs5. Created the file [path_to_web_site_root]/docker/goaccess/goaccess.conf (with this files contents: https://raw.githubusercontent.com/allinurl/goaccess/master/config/goaccess.conf) and made the following modifications per the Docker page instructions:
- log-format COMBINED
- log-file /srv/logs/access_ssl_log
- output /srv/report/index.html
- real-time-html trueI know, it's clunky, but it appears to be working. My biggest disappointment (unless there is a setting that I'm not aware of) is that I can only point to one log file in goaccess.conf (access_log or access_ssl_log). If anyone is more of a GoAccess expert and knows how to configure it (via goaccess.conf since we're not using command-line) to process more than on log file, please let me know.
-
105 votes
The feature request in our backlog for the next release.
SE
Daniel Hendricks
supported this idea
·
-
38 votes
Thank you for your input! We will consider this functionality in upcoming releases if it will be popular.
Everyone, please continue voting for this feature if you consider it important.
—
IGDaniel Hendricks
supported this idea
·
-
353 votes
Hi everyone,
This is most definitely a valid request and, in fact, we’ve been doing some research on this topic for quite some time. There is no ETA at the moment, but we would really appreciate you voting for this request so that we can accurately assess its popularity relative to other features. Thanks in advance!
—AK
Daniel Hendricks
supported this idea
·
-
7 votesDaniel Hendricks
shared this idea
·
-
69 votesDaniel Hendricks
supported this idea
·
-
13 votesopen discussion · 2 comments · Feature Suggestions » Billing / WHMCS · Flag idea as inappropriate… · Admin →Daniel Hendricks
supported this idea
·
-
5 votesDaniel Hendricks
shared this idea
·
-
1 voteDaniel Hendricks
shared this idea
·
I feel like it would be nice to configure per site? For example, if I have a web site where I don't feel like listing every cookie and possible impact of linking to CDNs for various assets to comply with GDPR (They're logging my IP address! Get or set up a ch€ap VPN if that bothers you), it would be convenient to block affected countries. I certainly wouldn't want to do this for every site, but it would be nice to be able to push a button (so to speak) for sites where I don't care about European traffic. I'm not suggesting a "block GDPR traffic" button in the admin (that would be silly), but perhaps a way to more easily group rubbish traffic by type?