eightynn

My feedback

  1. 960 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    open discussion  ·  113 comments  ·  Feature Suggestions » Plesk (general)  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    eightynn commented  · 

    Would be great. Plesk could sell millions of extra license's ...

    eightynn supported this idea  · 
  2. 325 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    open discussion  ·  28 comments  ·  Feature Suggestions » Mail  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    eightynn supported this idea  · 
  3. 374 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    46 comments  ·  Feature Suggestions » Security  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →

    We have serious doubts this function can really increase server security:
    1) Plesk has built-in protection against brute-force on login – it will lock the login form. So no one can try multiple attempts
    2) Arbitrary login name adds very little guess-complexity to a proper password. If you have concerns for your login brute-forced – add another 5-7 characters into your password and feel safe.

    As changed login name is still very likely to be some sort of vocabulary word or derived from your other account name – this function would only give a false sense of better security. Your security strength is in complex password, not in a complex login name. If you have one good password, you don’t need to treat login as your “second password” – one good password is enough.

    As for concerns that default password requirement is set in “weak”, that fail2ban module is not…

    eightynn supported this idea  · 
  4. 333 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    31 comments  ·  Feature Suggestions » Web Applications  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    eightynn commented  · 

    Yes, Please!

    eightynn supported this idea  · 
  5. 232 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    104 comments  ·  Feature Suggestions » Web / PHP  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    eightynn commented  · 
    eightynn supported this idea  · 
    eightynn commented  · 

    +1
    Please!

  6. 425 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    41 comments  ·  Feature Suggestions » Web  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    eightynn commented  · 

    Please make Memcached available

    eightynn supported this idea  · 
  7. 418 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    49 comments  ·  Feature Suggestions » Web  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    eightynn supported this idea  · 
  8. 409 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    open discussion  ·  60 comments  ·  Feature Suggestions » Security  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    eightynn commented  · 

    this feature is more important today than ever. i don't really understand why so few votes were made for it. :(

    eightynn supported this idea  · 
  9. 165 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    22 comments  ·  Feature Suggestions » Web / SSL  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    eightynn supported this idea  · 
  10. 174 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    55 comments  ·  Feature Suggestions » Mail  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →

    Hi.

    The first version of SNI support for Mail is available in Plesk Obsidian: https://docs.plesk.com/release-notes/obsidian/change-log/#18-rc10

    You need MailEnable 10.20+ (for Windows) or Postfix 3.4+ and Dovecot (for Linux) to test it.

    There are cases when it doesn’t work (e.g., if you connect to mail.domain.com it will not work, please use domain.com in connection settings of your mail client) that’s why we don’t mark it as “available”. We plan to fix these issues soon.

    — rk

    eightynn commented  · 

    Is this feature already released for Linux?

    eightynn commented  · 

    SNI (server name indication) support in the Postfix SMTP server, the Postfix SMTP client, and in the tlsproxy(8) daemon (both server and client roles)....

    eightynn supported this idea  · 
    eightynn commented  · 

    + 1
    Our Clients are requestion SSL for their mail services using their own domains, too. They're threatening to cancel us and change providers.

  11. 809 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    open discussion  ·  155 comments  ·  Feature Suggestions » Mail  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    eightynn supported this idea  · 

Feedback and Knowledge Base