Bryan S. Katz
My feedback
-
223 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment Bryan S. Katz
supported this idea
·
-
1,498 votes
We hear you and see a clear demand for this feature.
I want to say that implementing these features requires a lot of investment, and in 2021 Plesk team keeps focusing on the delivery of other improvements (sad, but true).
We will back to the re-evaluation of these features at the beginning of the next year.
Please continue to share your use cases and requirements, and it would really helpful if you point to existing solutions that we can review and check before implementation.
Your feedback is important to us. Thank you, everyone.
—
AABryan S. Katz
supported this idea
·
-
89 votesBryan S. Katz
supported this idea
·
-
33 votesBryan S. Katz
supported this idea
·
-
85 votes
Thank you for your input! We will consider this functionality in upcoming releases, if it will be popular.
Everyone, please continue voting for this feature if you consider it important.-DL
Bryan S. Katz
supported this idea
·
-
57 votes
Thank you for your input! We will consider this functionality in upcoming releases, if it will be popular.
Everyone, please continue voting for this feature if you consider it important.—
IGBryan S. Katz
supported this idea
·
-
77 votesBryan S. Katz
supported this idea
·
-
35 votes
Thank you for your input! We will consider this functionality in upcoming releases.
We have created internal document with ID PPM-569 for your reference.
Everyone, please continue voting for this feature if you consider it important.
—
ETBryan S. Katz
supported this idea
·
-
53 votes
Look at this solution for Postfix – http://webmasters.stackexchange.com/questions/57746/plesk-email-journaling
But anyway, thank you for your input! We will consider this suggestion in upcoming releases if it will be popular.
Everyone, please continue voting for this feature and add your comments if you consider it important.
—
IGBryan S. Katz
supported this idea
·
-
199 votesBryan S. Katz
supported this idea
·
-
45 votes
Could you explain why total subscription size is not enough? Why you would need a separate limit for mail content and web content?
UPD: reopened after new comments received
An error occurred while saving the comment Bryan S. Katz
commented
...because I program the web-site, and the disk space/web content is mine. I don't need to limit my own development, and I'm producing countless files of caches.
But the e-mail content is my client's, and I don't care if George gets more e-mail than Jim, or if Alice gets less e-mail than Bob. I don't care if Alice has six mailboxes and Bob has twelve.
I just want to limit my client to some reasonable amount of e-mail capacity, so that I can charge them for exceeding it. I don't need to know if Bob is the CEO or if Alice is the janitor. I don't know their usage patterns, and I really don't care.
Bryan S. Katz
supported this idea
·
-
47 votesBryan S. Katz
supported this idea
·
-
117 votes
Thank you for your input! We will consider this functionality in upcoming releases if it will be popular.
Everyone, please continue voting for this feature if you consider it important.
IB
Bryan S. Katz
supported this idea
·
-
166 votes
This is a valid request, so we’ll look into it. There is no ETA at the moment, but we would really appreciate you voting for this request so that we can accurately assess its popularity relative to other features. Thanks in advance!
IB
Bryan S. Katz
supported this idea
·
-
110 votes
Thank you for your input. We will see if it’s possible to add a nice-looking and straightforward autoresponder to supported webmail clients. Note that Plesk already does provide this functionality.
Bryan S. Katz
supported this idea
·
-
252 votes
Thank you for your input! We will consider this functionality in upcoming releases if it will be popular.
Everyone, please continue voting for this feature if you consider it important.
— IB
Bryan S. Katz
supported this idea
·
-
190 votesBryan S. Katz
supported this idea
·
-
644 votesBryan S. Katz
supported this idea
·
-
653 votesopen discussion · 115 comments · Feature Suggestions » Security · Flag idea as inappropriate… · Admin →Bryan S. Katz
supported this idea
·
Yup. In my case, my clients like to forward one@ to two@, and never wind up deleting (or even logging into) one@, But it's a full fledged mailbox for accountability and record-keeping purposes. No matter how big it is, it fills up. Would be great to have any convenient way of deleting from it, scheduled or otherwise.