Bryan S. Katz
My feedback
17 results found
-
243 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment Bryan S. Katz
supported this idea
·
-
94 votesBryan S. Katz
supported this idea
·
-
53 votes
Thank you for your input! We will consider this functionality in upcoming releases if it will be popular.
Everyone, please continue voting for this feature if you consider it important.
Bryan S. Katz
supported this idea
·
-
100 votes
Thank you for your input! We will consider this functionality in upcoming releases, if it will be popular.
Everyone, please continue voting for this feature if you consider it important.-DL
Bryan S. Katz
supported this idea
·
-
68 votes
Thank you for your input! We will consider this functionality in upcoming releases, if it will be popular.
Everyone, please continue voting for this feature if you consider it important.—
IGBryan S. Katz
supported this idea
·
-
90 votesBryan S. Katz
supported this idea
·
-
39 votes
Thank you for your input! We will consider this functionality in upcoming releases.
We have created internal document with ID PPM-569 for your reference.
Everyone, please continue voting for this feature if you consider it important.
—
ETBryan S. Katz
supported this idea
·
-
64 votes
Look at this solution for Postfix – http://webmasters.stackexchange.com/questions/57746/plesk-email-journaling
But anyway, thank you for your input! We will consider this suggestion in upcoming releases if it will be popular.
Everyone, please continue voting for this feature and add your comments if you consider it important.
—
IGBryan S. Katz
supported this idea
·
-
220 votesBryan S. Katz
supported this idea
·
-
50 votes
Could you explain why total subscription size is not enough? Why you would need a separate limit for mail content and web content?
UPD: reopened after new comments received
An error occurred while saving the comment Bryan S. Katz
commented
...because I program the web-site, and the disk space/web content is mine. I don't need to limit my own development, and I'm producing countless files of caches.
But the e-mail content is my client's, and I don't care if George gets more e-mail than Jim, or if Alice gets less e-mail than Bob. I don't care if Alice has six mailboxes and Bob has twelve.
I just want to limit my client to some reasonable amount of e-mail capacity, so that I can charge them for exceeding it. I don't need to know if Bob is the CEO or if Alice is the janitor. I don't know their usage patterns, and I really don't care.
Bryan S. Katz
supported this idea
·
-
52 votesBryan S. Katz
supported this idea
·
-
60 votes
Thank you for your input! We will consider this functionality in upcoming releases if it will be popular.
Everyone, please continue voting for this feature if you consider it important.
—
IGBryan S. Katz
supported this idea
·
-
132 votes
Thank you for your input! We will consider this functionality in upcoming releases if it will be popular.
Everyone, please continue voting for this feature if you consider it important.
IB
Bryan S. Katz
supported this idea
·
-
179 votes
This is a valid request, so we’ll look into it. There is no ETA at the moment, but we would really appreciate you voting for this request so that we can accurately assess its popularity relative to other features. Thanks in advance!
IB
Bryan S. Katz
supported this idea
·
-
276 votes
Thank you for your input! We will consider this functionality in upcoming releases if it will be popular.
Everyone, please continue voting for this feature if you consider it important.
— IB
Bryan S. Katz
supported this idea
·
-
202 votesBryan S. Katz
supported this idea
·
-
698 votesBryan S. Katz
supported this idea
·
Yup. In my case, my clients like to forward one@ to two@, and never wind up deleting (or even logging into) one@, But it's a full fledged mailbox for accountability and record-keeping purposes. No matter how big it is, it fills up. Would be great to have any convenient way of deleting from it, scheduled or otherwise.