Cool Dark
My feedback
-
28 votesCool Dark
supported this idea
·
-
649 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment Cool Dark
supported this idea
·
-
17 votes
Thank you for your input! We will consider this functionality in upcoming releases, if it will be popular.
Everyone, please continue voting for this feature if you consider it important.
—ES
Cool Dark
supported this idea
·
-
47 votes
While we wish it as much as you do, this is not possible to deliver Docker at customer level at the moment as customers can gain root-level access through the Docker CT and it will be an ultimate security breach.
The only generic way to deliver such function is wrapping all containers of a customer into a sort of VM similarly to Kubernetes “pods”, but Plesk itself runs in VM commonly and cannot produce extra tier of VMs. So we are very much limited by Docker itself and we are exploring how we can overcome it.
If you wish to continue conversation, please join talk.plesk.com
Thank youCool Dark
supported this idea
·
-
137 votes
Thank you for your input! We will consider this functionality in upcoming releases if it will be popular.
Everyone, please continue voting for this feature if you consider it important.— rk
Cool Dark
supported this idea
·
-
12 votes
Thanks for your proposal! It sounds interesting
We’d like to encourage everyone to keep voting for this functionCool Dark
supported this idea
·
-
15 votes
Thank you for your input! We will consider this functionality in upcoming releases, if it will be popular.
Everyone, please continue voting for this feature if you consider it important.— ES
Cool Dark
supported this idea
·
-
114 votes
Thank you for your input! We will consider this functionality in upcoming releases, if it will be popular.
Everyone, please continue voting for this feature if you consider it important.—
IGCool Dark
supported this idea
·
-
7 votesCool Dark
supported this idea
·
-
44 votes
Thank you for your input! We will consider this functionality in upcoming releases, if it will be popular.
Everyone, please continue voting for this feature if you consider it important.
— ES
Cool Dark
supported this idea
·
-
22 votesCool Dark
supported this idea
·
-
22 votes
Thank you for your input. We will consider the possibility of implementing this feature in upcoming releases.
— ES
Cool Dark
supported this idea
·
An error occurred while saving the comment Cool Dark
commented
I would prefer to have it like it is implemented for Horde+Roundcube. So you can install either PMA and/or Adminer and are able to set it up in each subcription plan if the cusomer can use both or only one.
-
24 votes
Thank you for your input! We will consider this functionality in upcoming releases if it will be popular.
—
ETCool Dark
supported this idea
·
-
397 votes
Thank you for your input! We will consider this functionality in upcoming releases if it will be popular.
Everyone, please continue voting for this feature if you consider it important.
—
IGCool Dark
supported this idea
·
-
45 votes
Could you explain why total subscription size is not enough? Why you would need a separate limit for mail content and web content?
UPD: reopened after new comments received
Cool Dark
supported this idea
·
-
26 votes
Thank you for your input, we will consider this functionality in upcoming Plesk releases.
—AK
Cool Dark
supported this idea
·
-
25 votesopen discussion · 3 comments · Feature Suggestions » Plesk (general) · Flag idea as inappropriate… · Admin →Cool Dark
supported this idea
·
-
50 votesCool Dark
supported this idea
·
-
51 votesopen discussion · 16 comments · Feature Suggestions » Plesk (general) · Flag idea as inappropriate… · Admin →Cool Dark
supported this idea
·
-
360 votesopen discussion · 53 comments · Feature Suggestions » Plesk (general) · Flag idea as inappropriate… · Admin →Cool Dark
supported this idea
·
.png){kind=link}
A short note about planned in which quarter or year would be nice.