Marco Marsala
My feedback
27 results found
-
35 votes
We will consider this functionality in upcoming releases if it is popular. Everyone, please continue voting for this feature if you consider it important.
However, please be aware that rate-limiting web traffic can and should normally be done using iptables as it is much more effective and resource savvy doing it on the operating system/kernel level. If there are issues with web traffic, it is best to not to let it get to the web server in the first place.
-- PD
Marco Marsala supported this idea · -
438 votes
Thank you for your input! We will consider this functionality in upcoming releases if it will be popular.
Everyone, please continue voting for this feature if you consider it important.
— AY
An error occurred while saving the comment Marco Marsala supported this idea · -
69 votes
Thank you for your input! We will consider this functionality in upcoming releases, if it will be popular.
Everyone, please continue voting for this feature if you consider it important.—
IGMarco Marsala supported this idea · -
5 votesMarco Marsala shared this idea ·
-
23 votes
Thank you for your input! We will consider this functionality in upcoming releases, if it will be popular.
Everyone, please continue voting for this feature if you consider it important.
—
ETMarco Marsala supported this idea · -
100 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment Marco Marsala commentedAnd maybe the abuse contact for the IP owner (via RIPE Database Query) and an extract of the log. Just things ready to send abuse reports.
Marco Marsala supported this idea · -
26 votesMarco Marsala shared this idea ·
-
7 votesMarco Marsala shared this idea ·
-
4 votes
hank you for your input! We will consider this functionality in upcoming releases if it will be popular.
Everyone, please continue voting for this feature if you consider it important.
—
IGMarco Marsala shared this idea · -
8 votes
Thank you for your input! We will consider this functionality in upcoming releases if it will be popular.
Everyone, please continue voting for this feature if you consider it important.
__
IGMarco Marsala shared this idea · -
2 votes
This is a valid request, so we’ll look into it. There is no ETA at the moment, but we would really appreciate you voting for this request so that we can accurately assess its popularity relative to other features. Thanks in advance!
— rk
Marco Marsala supported this idea ·Marco Marsala shared this idea · -
4 votes
The problem may be in that destination server will not be able to use specified version of PHP for the migrated domain because of absence in official OS vendor’s repository. To prevent this kind of problems we see improvement of pre-migration checker which will notify you about possible post-migration issues. After that, the server administrator must solve the problem himself. The automatic resolving of these incompatibilities looks very dangerous.
—
IGAn error occurred while saving the comment Marco Marsala commentedWhile migrating some subscriptions only, it is not useful and confusing that that Plesk Migrator complain about:
- missing plesk-mobile extension on destination server
- missing Courier-IMAP (if destination server uses Dovecot)An error occurred while saving the comment Marco Marsala commented> "in that destination server will not be able to use specified version of PHP for the migrated domain because of absence in official OS vendor’s repository"
Infact I installed the specified version via Plesk Installer.
> "The automatic resolving of these incompatibilities looks very dangerous."
No, if you limit to those PHP parameters you can already change via Plesk UI on a per-domain basis. Here is the list: https://snag.gy/VPKklM.jpg
Please check other glitches in my comments too.
An error occurred while saving the comment Marco Marsala commentedToo, clicking "Details" link near to a failed migration freeze the browser for ages to open the popup even with short outputs.
An error occurred while saving the comment Marco Marsala commentedOther small glitches I've found:
If a migration fails while performing database migration, business objects aren't fully migrated too and this isn't noticed at all. Even worse, when you fixed the database issue and retry the migration, clicking the button "Re-sync", a clever popup asks what objects has to be re-synced, but the checkbox "Business objects" is *deselected* by default. This is confusing and unexpected, as the database migration is not related to business objects.
Use case:
1) Migrate testdomain.tld from target server A to destination server B;
2) Migration fails because MySQL is older on the destination server and some features aren't supported;
3) You fix the database issue and retry the database migration only, because files and mails we're migrated without issues.
4) The resulting domain is missing Let's Encrypt certificates.
5) Re-syncing migration selecting checkbox "Business objects" restores the missing certificate.Marco Marsala shared this idea · -
3 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment Marco Marsala commentedThere are bugs too.
Doing these steps:
1) Install MSSQL2014 via Plesk Installer
2) Install MSSQL2012 via Plesk Installer
3) Remove MSSQL2014 following the KB: https://support.plesk.com/hc/en-us/articles/213951225-How-to-uninstall-an-Existing-Instance-of-SQL-ServerWill result in MSSQL2012 instance not being shown anymore under Tools & Settings > Database Servers. Even worse, trying to migrate a MS SQL Server 2012 Database with Plesk Migrator from a target server will result in error message: "The component mssql2012 is not installed on the destination server. mssql2012 will be unavaiable for all restored objects. Please install mssql2012. Note that this may take a few minutes."
Marco Marsala shared this idea · -
4 votesMarco Marsala shared this idea ·
-
66 votes
Look at this solution for Postfix – http://webmasters.stackexchange.com/questions/57746/plesk-email-journaling
But anyway, thank you for your input! We will consider this suggestion in upcoming releases if it will be popular.
Everyone, please continue voting for this feature and add your comments if you consider it important.
—
IGMarco Marsala supported this idea · -
181 votes
This is a valid request, so we’ll look into it. There is no ETA at the moment, but we would really appreciate you voting for this request so that we can accurately assess its popularity relative to other features. Thanks in advance!
IB
An error occurred while saving the comment Marco Marsala commentedSo you can implement your own Asana-like inbound email handler :-)
cPanel offers this functionality.Marco Marsala supported this idea · -
165 votes
Thank you for your input. We will consider the possibility of implementing this feature in upcoming releases.
Since Plesk Onyx panel admin will be able to install different MySQL versions as a Docker containers, then the DB servers can be connected as remote DB to Plesk.
SE
An error occurred while saving the comment Marco Marsala commentedNot useful in sysadmin point of view
-
70 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment Marco Marsala commentedThere are free alternatives too, like BinaryCanary. Don't implement this or you will get too many false positives.
-
75 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment Marco Marsala commentedWhy? Exchange has it own panel.
-
134 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment Marco Marsala commentedfail2ban maybe quite dangerous...
The SSL certificate is not applied to webserver listening on port 8443, even if installed for the domain.
Live example:
https://www.holidayworld.it/ shown as secure
while https://www.holidayworld.it:8443/ is shown as not secure