Skip to content

Anonymous

My feedback

10 results found

  1. 1,255 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Anonymous commented  · 

    As mentioned before, clamav can be integrated (at least on Ubuntu) with a few simple steps. Thus, I really wonder what Plesk considers to be the expensive part of integrating this (except for losing people paying for the DrWeb extension).

    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Anonymous commented  · 

    Looking at the fact that Plesk Email Security Pro now includes ClamAV, I assume from a change request point of view, Plesk will see this as solved.
    However, it is VERY DISAPPOINTING to see again that Plesk failed to follow the community demand having this as an unpaid extension.
    Also, from a security standpoint, I think it is socially not acceptable that they require us to pay for it, especially given the fact that they mainly employ open software for this feature.
    In addition, the extension has the drawback that greylisting needs to be disabled, which I think is a bad idea.

    Nevertheless, following https://www.lloyd-day.me/migrate-plesk-to-clamav/, there is quite a simple solution if you want to integrate ClamAV yourself.
    By not uninstalling DrWeb (free protection of 10 mailboxes), you can even run both in parallel by adapting the information in step 4 (settings for /etc/postfix/main.cf):

    With psa_remote and ClamAV, I use:
    smtpd_milters = {inet:127.0.0.1:12768, default_action=accept}, { inet:127.0.0.1:3381, protocol=6, default_action=tempfail }
    non_smtpd_milters = , inet:127.0.0.1:12768

    This setting also helps to avoid issues when DrWeb fails to scan e-mails (happens quite frequently)...

    Anonymous supported this idea  · 
  2. 7 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Anonymous supported this idea  · 
  3. 88 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    "1. Ability to control [DKIM] key length 1024Bit or 2048Bit (server wide)"

    is available since Plesk 18.0.55, published August 29th, 2023

    https://docs.plesk.com/release-notes/obsidian/change-log/#plesk-18055

    "4. Ability to change the [DKIM] selector"

    is available since Plesk 18.0.56, published Ocotber 10th, 2023

    https://docs.plesk.com/release-notes/obsidian/change-log/#plesk-18056

    Stay in the loop for more to come. 

    -- PD

    Anonymous supported this idea  · 
  4. 27 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Anonymous supported this idea  · 
  5. 10 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Anonymous supported this idea  · 
  6. 280 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Anonymous commented  · 

    I agree with H. Dolderer, this is a must for current systems - also given that in certain combinations of using SSL for Plesk and the corresponding website, it is otherwise impossible to access the admin interface right now!
    Also, looking at the implementation effort, this should almost be zero since the same has been done for the webmail system already. Thus, it is disappointing to read a statement like "we might eventually implement this at some point (> 10 years...?) in the future"...

    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Anonymous commented  · 

    You're right, it is currently not supported: https://support.plesk.com/hc/en-us/articles/115002810634

    However, given the comment from darkdragen, I agree that the service should be secured the same way as it has been done already for the webmail subdomains.

    Anonymous supported this idea  · 
  7. 693 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Anonymous commented  · 

    Annoying that it is a premium extension only!

    Anonymous supported this idea  · 
  8. 402 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Anonymous supported this idea  · 
  9. 526 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Anonymous supported this idea  · 
  10. 227 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Anonymous supported this idea  · 

Feedback and Knowledge Base