Anonymous
My feedback
21 results found
-
2 votes
Thank you for your input. We will consider this functionality in upcoming releases if it is popular. Everyone, please continue voting for this feature if you consider it important.
—
IGAnonymous supported this idea · -
2 votes
Thank you for your feature request. We will consider the possibility of its implementation if it becomes sufficiently popular and in demand.
—
IG -
2 votes
Thank you for your input. We will consider this functionality in upcoming releases if it is popular. Everyone, please continue voting for this feature if you consider it important.
—
IG -
3 votes
Thank you for your input. We will consider this functionality in upcoming releases if it is popular. Everyone, please continue voting for this feature if you consider it important.
—
IGAnonymous supported this idea · -
54 votesAnonymous supported this idea ·
-
98 votesAnonymous supported this idea ·
-
110 votesAnonymous supported this idea ·
-
140 votes
Thank you for your input! We will consider these nginx configuration suggestions in upcoming releases if it will be popular.
Everyone, please continue voting for this feature and add your comments if you consider it important.
—
IGAnonymous supported this idea · -
95 votesAnonymous supported this idea ·
-
46 votesAnonymous supported this idea ·
-
66 votes
Thank you for your input! We will consider this functionality in upcoming releases if it will be popular.
Everyone, please continue voting for this feature if you consider it important.
—
IGAnonymous supported this idea · -
49 votes
These suggestions look quite reasonable. We encourage other WPT users to join and let us know what other security improvements you’d like us to implement in WPT.
—AK
Anonymous supported this idea · -
15 votesAnonymous supported this idea ·
-
11 votesAnonymous supported this idea ·
-
14 votesAnonymous supported this idea ·
-
42 votesAnonymous supported this idea ·
-
56 votesAnonymous supported this idea ·
-
11 votesAnonymous supported this idea ·
-
851 votes
Would you mind to try Nginx caching in Plesk Onyx 17.8 Preview?
This would be very helpful to get your experienced feedback here http://www.surveygizmo.com/s3/4165754/Plesk-17-8-Preview
Anonymous supported this idea · -
4 votes
AFAIU, the request is about right ciphers for SSL configuration. We have a documentation how to do it manually: https://docs.plesk.com/en-US/onyx/administrator-guide/plesk-administration/securing-plesk/pci-dss-compliance/tune-plesk-to-meet-pci-dss-on-windows.78901/ but have no tool to do it automatically, so, this is a valid request, we’ll look into it.
There is no ETA at the moment, but we would really appreciate you voting for this request so that we can accurately assess its popularity relative to other features. Thanks in advance!
— rk
Anonymous supported this idea ·An error occurred while saving the comment
I do not know the specific - however if a client with ssl does a test on a Plesk server the result is the server is un-safe. This I can confirm on windows and the issue is windows and plesk did not deactivate old chiper- I think as a provisioning tool plesk should ensure the server is configured utmost
This fixes the un-safe messages
[HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SYSTEM\CurrentControlSet\Control\SecurityProviders\SCHANNEL\Ciphers\RC4 128/128]
"Enabled"=dword:00000000
[HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SYSTEM\CurrentControlSet\Control\SecurityProviders\SCHANNEL\Ciphers\Triple DES 168]
"Enabled"=dword:00000000