Jonathan Jewell
My feedback
248 results found
-
39 votesJonathan Jewell supported this idea ·
-
40 votesJonathan Jewell supported this idea ·
-
42 votesJonathan Jewell supported this idea ·
-
38 votes
Thank you for your input. We will consider this functionality in upcoming releases, if it will be popular.
Everyone, please continue voting for this feature if you consider it important.—
IGJonathan Jewell supported this idea · -
39 votes
Thank you for your input! We will consider this functionality in upcoming releases if it will be popular.
Everyone, please continue voting for this feature if you consider it important.— rk
Jonathan Jewell supported this idea · -
39 votes
Thank you for your input! We will consider this functionality in upcoming releases.
We have created internal document with ID PPM-569 for your reference.
Everyone, please continue voting for this feature if you consider it important.
—
ETJonathan Jewell supported this idea · -
38 votes
This feature has not gotten many votes during the past five years. Technically, a graceful restart of Apache is unnoticeable for the user as not service interruption occurs. Further, Apaches model loads all configuration data into memory upon start or reload. The Odin link provided in the comments does not lead to a more details explanation of the feature request. And finally, in the Nginx/Apache combination with an increasing number of users considering Nginx-only hosting a change in the Apache worker process won't be sufficient.
Please provide a sound explanation why a graceful restart of web servers is insufficient for adding or modifying web server configuration.
-- PD
Jonathan Jewell supported this idea · -
40 votes
This is a valid request. We will consider this functionality in upcoming releases if it will be popular.
Everyone, please continue voting for this feature if you consider it important.
-- PD
Jonathan Jewell supported this idea · -
40 votes
Thank you for your input. We will consider the possibility of implementing this feature in upcoming releases.
— ES
Jonathan Jewell supported this idea · -
40 votes
Thank you for your input! We will consider this functionality in upcoming releases if it will be popular.
Everyone, please continue voting for this feature if you consider it important.— rk
Jonathan Jewell supported this idea · -
42 votesJonathan Jewell supported this idea ·
-
43 votes
Thank you for your input! We will consider this functionality in upcoming releases if it will be popular.
Everyone, please continue voting for this feature if you consider it important.— rk
Jonathan Jewell supported this idea · -
42 votesJonathan Jewell supported this idea ·
-
42 votesJonathan Jewell supported this idea ·
-
47 votes
Thank you for your input. We will consider this functionality in upcoming releases if it is popular. Everyone, please continue voting for this feature if you consider it important.
—
IGJonathan Jewell supported this idea · -
42 votes
Thank you for your input. We will consider this functionality in upcoming releases if it is popular. Everyone, please continue voting for this feature if you consider it important.
—
IGJonathan Jewell supported this idea · -
43 votes
Thank you for your input. We will review this nginx module to see if we should support it out of the box
Jonathan Jewell supported this idea · -
47 votes
Thank you for your input! We will consider this functionality in upcoming releases, if it will be popular.
Everyone, please continue voting for this feature if you consider it important.
— ES
Jonathan Jewell supported this idea · -
43 votes
Thank you for your input! We will consider this functionality in upcoming releases if it will be popular.
Everyone, please continue voting for this feature if you consider it important.
—
IGJonathan Jewell supported this idea · -
44 votesJonathan Jewell supported this idea ·