Anonymous
My feedback
22 results found
-
47 votes
Thank you for your input! We will consider this functionality in upcoming releases if it is popular. Everyone, please continue voting for this feature if you consider it important.
--
IG
Anonymous
supported this idea
·
-
100 votes
Thank you for your input! We will consider this functionality in upcoming releases if it will be popular. Everyone, please continue voting for this feature if you consider it important.
—
IGAnonymous
supported this idea
·
-
236 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment Anonymous
supported this idea
·
-
558 votesAnonymous
supported this idea
·
-
17 votes
Thank you for your input! We will consider this functionality in upcoming releases if it is popular. Everyone, please continue voting for this feature if you consider it important.
--
IG
An error occurred while saving the comment Anonymous
commented
Modern Node.js applications are only using ES6 syntax. This is crucial to run modern node.js applications.
Anonymous
supported this idea
·
-
5 votes
Thank you for your idea! We will consider this functionality in upcoming releases if it will be popular.
Everyone, please continue voting for this feature if you consider it important.
-- PD
An error occurred while saving the comment Anonymous
commented
For example, I run a docker with image 'portainer/portainer'.
I mapped the (container internal) port 9000 to host port 49153.
Right now, I am able to access the portainer container with ip:49153 in the web, even if I set up a docker proxy rule to access it with a subdomain.
Blocking this port from external ips through the firewall is not working.Anonymous
shared this idea
·
-
7 votes
This is a valid request, so we'll look into it. There is no ETA at the moment, but we would really appreciate you voting for this request so that we can accurately assess its popularity relative to other features.
Thanks in advance!
--
IG
Anonymous
supported this idea
·
-
1 vote
This is a valid request, so we'll look into it. There is no ETA at the moment, but we would really appreciate you voting for this request so that we can accurately assess its popularity relative to other features.
Thanks in advance!
--
IG
Anonymous
shared this idea
·
-
46 votes
Thank you for your input. We will consider this functionality in upcoming releases if it is popular. Everyone, please continue voting for this feature if you consider it important.
—
IGAnonymous
supported this idea
·
-
3 votes
Thank you for your input. We will consider this functionality in upcoming releases if it is popular. Everyone, please continue voting for this feature if you consider it important.
—
IGAnonymous
supported this idea
·
-
142 votes
Thank you for your input! We will consider these nginx configuration suggestions in upcoming releases if it will be popular.
Everyone, please continue voting for this feature and add your comments if you consider it important.
—
IGAnonymous
supported this idea
·
-
1,328 votesAnonymous
supported this idea
·
-
15 votes
Thank you for your input. We will consider this functionality in upcoming releases if it will be popular. Everyone, please continue voting for this feature if you consider it important.
—
IGAnonymous
supported this idea
·
-
8 votes
Thank you for your input! We will consider this functionality in upcoming releases if it is popular. Everyone, please continue voting for this feature if you consider it important.
--
IG
An error occurred while saving the comment Anonymous
commented
Right now, only the content of plesk, resellers and so on can be migrated.
It would be great if you can choose in the migrator that it will migrate the server settings, notifications, templates and so on too.Anonymous
supported this idea
·
-
62 votes
Thanks for your feature request. We will definitely consider the possibility of its implementation if it receives a significant number of votes and is in demand.
—
IGAnonymous
supported this idea
·
-
102 votesAnonymous
supported this idea
·
-
24 votes
Thank you for your input! We will consider this functionality in upcoming releases if it will be popular.
Everyone, please continue voting for this feature if you consider it important.— rk
Anonymous
supported this idea
·
-
37 votes
We will consider this functionality in upcoming releases if it will be popular. However, in part of integration with 3rd party, probably it will be faster if you create Plesk extension. Please refer to https://docs.plesk.com/en-US/17.0/extensions-guide/what-are-plesk-extensions%3F.76331/ to know how.
Everyone, please continue voting for this feature if you consider it important.
—
ETAnonymous
supported this idea
·
-
18 votes
In the past, when some OSes supported by Plesk used 'sysvinit', it was reasonable to monitor and restart PHP-FPM services. Currently, all supported OSes are systemd-based and systemd monitors and restarts PHP-FPM services by itself if necessary.
Monit (as a part of the Watchdog extension) performs regular checks every 5 minutes. The systemd detects the service down in a few seconds and restarts it.
The question is, is the request still valid and actual? Why do you prefer to monitor PHP-FPM services with Watchdog/Monit, and why is systemd monitoring not enough?
Anonymous
supported this idea
·
-
23 votes
Thank you for your input. We will consider this functionality in upcoming releases if it is popular. Everyone, please continue voting for this feature if you consider it important.
—
IGAnonymous
supported this idea
·
+1