Max Korzhanoff
My feedback
21 results found
-
1,177 votes
-
5 votes
Allowing endusers to whitelist themselves can result in significant security risks. For example malicious users could use this tactic to drive brute-force attacks against the server or other users on the same server which cannot be noticed when that malicious user has whitelisted his own IP. Please let us know in your comments what scenarios you see where allowing an enduser to circumvent a security mechanism is a benefit for operating your server.
-- PD
Max Korzhanoff supported this idea ·
-
21 votes
Thank you for your input! Actually, we have no plans for such module, but we will consider this functionality in upcoming releases, if it will be popular.
Everyone, please continue voting for this feature if you consider it important.—
IGMax Korzhanoff supported this idea ·
-
175 votes
Everyone, please continue voting for this feature if you consider it important.
— rk
An error occurred while saving the comment Max Korzhanoff supported this idea ·
-
256 votes
Thank you for your input! We will consider this functionality in upcoming releases if it will be popular.
Everyone, please continue voting for this feature if you consider it important.
— AY
Max Korzhanoff supported this idea ·
-
200 votes
Thank you for your input! We will consider this functionality in upcoming releases, if it will be popular.
Everyone, please continue voting for this feature if you consider it important.—
IGMax Korzhanoff supported this idea ·
-
213 votes
Max Korzhanoff supported this idea ·
-
211 votes
Max Korzhanoff supported this idea ·
-
326 votes
Thank you for your input! We will consider this functionality in upcoming releases if it will be popular.
Everyone, please continue voting for this feature if you consider it important.— SU
Max Korzhanoff supported this idea ·
-
363 votes
As UserVoice staff cleaned up the most of twisted voices, I’ve returning this suggestion to open discussion.
Everyone, please continue voting for this feature if you consider it important.
—IB
Max Korzhanoff supported this idea ·
-
297 votes
Thank you for your input! We will consider this functionality in upcoming releases if it will be popular.
Everyone, please continue voting for this feature if you consider it important.— rk
Max Korzhanoff supported this idea ·
-
375 votes
This is a valid request, so we’ll look into it. There is no ETA at the moment, but we would really appreciate you voting for this request so that we can accurately assess its popularity relative to other features.
The original request contains a manual solution, so, we consider to automate it. Please, add a comment if your case will not be solved with that solution.
Thanks in advance!
— rk
Max Korzhanoff supported this idea ·
-
570 votes
Since Plesk Onyx you will be able to install memcache as a Docker container and configure http(s) proxy rule for it to map to your web app.
Docker and proxy rules are available in Plesk Onyx Preview already, you can try it here https://talk.plesk.com/threads/plesk-onyx-preview-and-feedback.337172/
SE
Max Korzhanoff supported this idea ·
-
56 votes
Thank you for your input! We will consider this functionality in upcoming releases if it will be popular.
Everyone, please continue voting for this feature if you consider it important.
—
IGAn error occurred while saving the comment Max Korzhanoff commented
For Mail Archiving / Compliance / Security purposes
Max Korzhanoff shared this idea ·
-
219 votes
Thank you for your input! We will consider this functionality in upcoming releases if it will be popular.
Everyone, please continue voting for this feature if you consider it important.
— AY
Max Korzhanoff supported this idea ·
-
118 votes
Thank you for your input! We will consider this functionality in upcoming releases, if it will be popular.
Everyone, please continue voting for this feature if you consider it important.—
IGMax Korzhanoff supported this idea ·
-
188 votes
Thank you for your input! We will consider this functionality in upcoming releases, if it will be popular.
Everyone, please continue voting for this feature if you consider it important.
—
ETMax Korzhanoff supported this idea ·
-
219 votes
Thank you for your input. We will consider this functionality in upcoming releases. Note that Plesk supports multiple mail servers and if we are going to add this feature, it’s possible that it won’t be available for all supported mail servers at once
Max Korzhanoff supported this idea ·
-
198 votes
Max Korzhanoff supported this idea ·
-
1,580 votes
We hear you and see a clear demand for this feature.
I want to say that implementing these features requires a lot of investment, and in 2021 Plesk team keeps focusing on the delivery of other improvements (sad, but true).
We will back to the re-evaluation of these features at the beginning of the next year.
Please continue to share your use cases and requirements, and it would really helpful if you point to existing solutions that we can review and check before implementation.
Your feedback is important to us. Thank you, everyone.
—
AAMax Korzhanoff supported this idea ·
It would be a great level up for Plesk