Davi Medrade
My feedback
6 results found
-
7 votes
Thank you for your input. We will consider this functionality in upcoming releases if it is popular. Everyone, please continue voting for this feature if you consider it important.
—
IGAn error occurred while saving the comment -
96 votesDavi Medrade
supported this idea
·
-
16 votes
Thank you for your input. We will consider this functionality in upcoming releases, if it will be popular.
Everyone, please continue voting for this feature if you consider it important.—
IGDavi Medrade
supported this idea
·
-
199 votes
Thank you for your input! We are planning to implement this functionality in upcoming releases. The request is registered as: PPM-2517
Everyone, please continue voting for this feature if you consider it important.
— ES
Davi Medrade
supported this idea
·
-
1,303 votesDavi Medrade
supported this idea
·
-
205 votes
Everyone, please continue voting for this feature if you consider it important.
— rk
Davi Medrade
supported this idea
·
This would be great. I work for a pretty small company. Instead of several small servers, we opted to hire a few larger ones, so we host about 600 clients in our two Windows servers. So, when we want to move to a new version of Windows, we have about 300 websites to migrate, which even at datacenter speeds still takes several days (during which the server performance is degraded by the migration process). Then there's the expense of paying for both the old and the new server for a month in order to do the migration, and duplicating the settings to try to ease the transition for the clients.
Yes, the migration tool helps a lot… But being able to do an in-place upgrade would be a game-changer.