FutureX
My feedback
24 results found
-
15 votes
Thank you for the update! We will consider this functionality in upcoming releases if it will be popular.
Everyone, please continue voting for this feature if you consider it important.
—
IG -
128 votes
Thank you for your input! We will consider this functionality in upcoming releases if it will be popular.
Everyone, please continue voting for this feature if you consider it important.— rk
An error occurred while saving the comment FutureX
supported this idea
·
-
74 votes
Thank you for your input! We will consider this functionality in upcoming releases if it will be popular.
Everyone, please continue voting for this feature if you consider it important.— rk
FutureX
supported this idea
·
An error occurred while saving the comment FutureX
commented
Not sure how this 'slipped' by?
As it is now a Reseller can just create an Unlimited plan and max out your server.
How is that beneficial?
-
44 votes
Thank you for your input! We will consider this functionality in upcoming releases if it will be popular.
Everyone, please continue voting for this feature if you consider it important.
—
IGAn error occurred while saving the comment FutureX
commented
Just had a reseller client ask this exact question.
They are bringing on another developer who needs access to their entire reseller account but we're limited to only one admin?
FutureX
supported this idea
·
-
173 votes
Thank you for your input! We will consider this functionality in upcoming releases if it will be popular. Everyone, please continue voting for this feature if you consider it important.
—
IGFutureX
supported this idea
·
An error occurred while saving the comment FutureX
commented
Is this a joke? This makes no sense that this problem persists!
That means we can't sell 'email only' accounts?!
-
26 votes
-
3 votes
-
387 votes
Thank you for your input! We will consider this functionality in upcoming releases if it will be popular.
Everyone, please continue voting for this feature if you consider it important.
— AY
FutureX
supported this idea
·
-
540 votesFutureX
supported this idea
·
-
129 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment FutureX
commented
This is tied in with being able to assign a 'No hosting' type to all domains. Right now the Main domain has to be of type 'Website' if you have multiple domains.
And if you have a single domain set to 'No hosting' you can't add any more domains.
What if a client only purchases domain names and no hosting? They still need DNS access.
Then later on that customer decides to purchase hosting and it converts to a 'Website' type.
FutureX
supported this idea
·
-
36 votes
Many providers set a placeholder domain as the main subscription domain so that all domains actually "in use" in a subscription can be freely configured. Please consider this option as it will immediately solve the issue for you.
Besides that, this is a valid request. Everyone, please keep voting for it if you believe it is important.
-- PD
An error occurred while saving the comment FutureX
commented
And also add the ability to select 'No hosting' option as well. Gives the customer DNS access to their domains without purchasing a hosting package.
8 years?? really? Seems like such a simple feature to implement.
FutureX
supported this idea
·
-
2 votes
Thank you for your idea! We will consider this functionality in upcoming releases if it will be popular.
Everyone, please continue voting for this feature if you consider it important.
-- PD
FutureX
supported this idea
·
An error occurred while saving the comment FutureX
commented
Very important to be able to create a service plan that is a "Domain Only" plan. Right now you can not do this.
-
1 vote
-
56 votes
Thank you for your input! We will consider this functionality in upcoming releases if it will be popular.
Everyone, please continue voting for this feature if you consider it important.
—
IGFutureX
supported this idea
·
An error occurred while saving the comment FutureX
commented
I fully agree. Virtually all major web hosting companies offer WP-CLI access for 'each' user not just on a root level. I love that Plesk as the WP-CLI built in, that is very forward thinking. Now it just needs to be accessible to users with out giving them root access.
-
3 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment FutureX
commented
I just finally tracked down why ahrefs was getting a 403 "Forbidden" error when their bot tried to scan my site. It was the "Enable bot protection" security setting. Once I disabled that it was fine but would be nice to whitelist either their IPs or user agents.
FutureX
supported this idea
·
-
6 votes
Thank you for your input. We will consider this functionality in upcoming releases if it is popular. Everyone, please continue voting for this feature if you consider it important.
—
IGFutureX
supported this idea
·
-
15 votesFutureX
supported this idea
·
-
4 votes
Thank you for your input! We will consider this functionality in upcoming releases if it will be popular.
Everyone, please continue voting for this feature if you consider it important.—
IGFutureX
supported this idea
·
-
6 votesFutureX
supported this idea
·
-
16 votes
Thank you for your input! We will consider this functionality in upcoming releases if it will be popular.
Everyone, please continue voting for this feature if you consider it important.
—
IGFutureX
supported this idea
·
Yes vital functionality as stated below. We have clients who are hosting their website on other platforms but keeping their email with us. We generally manually create a mail. subdomain and secure that but can't create a webmail. subdomain so it creates problems.
Not to mention we have to manually set this up every time and webmail is not secured.