John Shiells
My feedback
18 results found
-
213 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment John Shiells
supported this idea
·
-
386 votes
Thank you for your input! We will consider this functionality in upcoming releases if it will be popular.
Everyone, please continue voting for this feature if you consider it important.
— AY
An error occurred while saving the comment John Shiells
commented
this is another one of those things that really bugs me... this topic was started in 2014.. it is literally ONE LINE in the postfix config
relayhost=some FQDN or IP.
why does this stuff take years to add when its in high demand.
John Shiells
supported this idea
·
-
1,059 votes
Hi all, Thanks for your input, really appreciate this! As you know, in Plesk Onyx 17.8 we made a significant improvement that allows you to use several cloud storages or even SFTP for remote backups. In Plesk Onyx 17.9 we will continue to improve Plesk Backup Manager in general and Flexible Backup Scheduler Manager in particular.
Based on the initial description and comments I can highlight 3 scenarios in the scope of this request:
#1. Keep Daily & Weekly & Monthly backups at the same time: (Example: 2 weeks of daily backups + weekly backups by each Monday)
#2. Backup to different storages (like daily to FTP and monthly to Google Drive)
#3. Multiple Storages of the same type (like 2 different FTP servers)
ID in our Issue Tracker: PPM-1701
-DLAn error occurred while saving the comment John Shiells
commented
how many votes and months need to pass before something being highly asked for gets done.
lets go!
John Shiells
supported this idea
·
-
543 votes
Thank you for your input! We will consider this functionality in upcoming releases if it will be popular.
Everyone, please continue voting for this feature if you consider it important.
—
IGAn error occurred while saving the comment John Shiells
commented
LETS GO!!! whats the hold up here....
its literally a nginx update and a single word added to the Listen line in nginx config files...
listen 443 quic reuseport;
listen 443 ssl http2;done
John Shiells
supported this idea
·
An error occurred while saving the comment John Shiells
commented
This needs to be added a month ago. lets get on it!
-
124 votes
Thank you for your input! We will consider this functionality in upcoming releases if it will be popular.
Everyone, please continue voting for this feature if you consider it important.— rk
An error occurred while saving the comment John Shiells
commented
can we get an update on when this will be working please?
i think this should be considered a BUG instead of a feature request.
An error occurred while saving the comment John Shiells
commented
Not having this should be considered a bug, not a feature request.
not being able to issue SSL certs if hosting is off or else ware is a flaw.
please get this implemented ASAP
John Shiells
supported this idea
·
-
333 votes
Thank you for your input! We will consider this functionality in upcoming releases if it will be popular.
Everyone, please continue voting for this feature if you consider it important.
— AY
John Shiells
supported this idea
·
-
90 votesJohn Shiells
supported this idea
·
-
97 votes
Hi everyone,
This seems to be important, so we’ll address it in one of the upcoming Plesk releases.
Please continue to vote so we can accurately assess the popularity of this request.
— AK
John Shiells
supported this idea
·
-
89 votes
Thank you for your input! We will consider this functionality in upcoming releases, if it will be popular.
Everyone, please continue voting for this feature if you consider it important.-DL
John Shiells
supported this idea
·
-
158 votesJohn Shiells
supported this idea
·
-
175 votes
Everyone, please continue voting for this feature if you consider it important.
— rk
John Shiells
supported this idea
·
-
198 votesJohn Shiells
supported this idea
·
-
6 votes
Thank you for your input! We will consider this functionality in upcoming releases if it will be popular.
Everyone, please continue voting for this feature if you consider it important.
— AY
John Shiells
supported this idea
·
-
154 votes
Thank you for your input. We will consider the possibility of implementing this feature in upcoming releases.
Since Plesk Onyx panel admin will be able to install different MySQL versions as a Docker containers, then the DB servers can be connected as remote DB to Plesk.
SE
John Shiells
supported this idea
·
-
21 votes
Thank you for your input! We will consider this functionality in upcoming releases if it will be popular.
Everyone, please continue voting for this feature if you consider it important.— rk
John Shiells
shared this idea
·
-
230 votes
Current scope for Plesk Onyx is to enable an ability to serve all http(s) requests by Nginx only.
Note: apache will still be installed. Switching of apache to optional component is subject for the next release.
Update:
The ability to turn off Apache and have content served by nginx only on a per-website basis is now available in the latest Plesk Onyx 17.0.14 preview. We encourage you to check the implementation and let us know what you think. Please visit the following forum thread to learn how to access the preview: https://talk.plesk.com/threads/plesk-onyx-preview-and-feedback.337172
How to try this feature:
Go to any website, click Apache & nginx Settings and deselect the “Proxy mode” checkbox under nginx settings. The feature is also available in Service Plans.
We would appreciate hearing your feedback on implementation of this functionality. Thanks in advance!
—AK
An error occurred while saving the comment John Shiells
commented
will this be at a subscription level ???
NGINX hosting set per subscription? hope it is not server wide.
An error occurred while saving the comment John Shiells
commented
... off topic but because someone brought it up... The current Node.JS using jxcore is brutal. does not work very well at all.
-
125 votesJohn Shiells
supported this idea
·
-
1,580 votes
We hear you and see a clear demand for this feature.
I want to say that implementing these features requires a lot of investment, and in 2021 Plesk team keeps focusing on the delivery of other improvements (sad, but true).
We will back to the re-evaluation of these features at the beginning of the next year.
Please continue to share your use cases and requirements, and it would really helpful if you point to existing solutions that we can review and check before implementation.
Your feedback is important to us. Thank you, everyone.
—
AAAn error occurred while saving the comment John Shiells
commented
this can be done using there virtual product and there storage engine
5 years later.........