Pinal Desai
My feedback
-
56 votes
-
1 vote
Thank you for your feature request. We will consider the possibility of its implementation if it becomes sufficiently popular and in demand.
—
IGPinal Desai
supported this idea
·
-
19 votes
Thank you for your input! We will consider this functionality in upcoming releases if it will be popular.
Everyone, please continue voting for this feature if you consider it important.—
IGPinal Desai
supported this idea
·
-
15 votes
Thank you for your input! We will consider this functionality in upcoming releases if it will be popular.
Everyone, please continue voting for this feature if you consider it important.— rk
Pinal Desai
supported this idea
·
-
459 votes
Thank you for your input! We will consider this functionality in upcoming releases if it will be popular.
Everyone, please continue voting for this feature if you consider it important.
—
IGPinal Desai
supported this idea
·
-
133 votes
Thank you for your input! We will consider these nginx configuration suggestions in upcoming releases if it will be popular.
Everyone, please continue voting for this feature and add your comments if you consider it important.
—
IGPinal Desai
supported this idea
·
-
221 votes
Current scope for Plesk Onyx is to enable an ability to serve all http(s) requests by Nginx only.
Note: apache will still be installed. Switching of apache to optional component is subject for the next release.
Update:
The ability to turn off Apache and have content served by nginx only on a per-website basis is now available in the latest Plesk Onyx 17.0.14 preview. We encourage you to check the implementation and let us know what you think. Please visit the following forum thread to learn how to access the preview: https://talk.plesk.com/threads/plesk-onyx-preview-and-feedback.337172
How to try this feature:
Go to any website, click Apache & nginx Settings and deselect the “Proxy mode” checkbox under nginx settings. The feature is also available in Service Plans.
We would appreciate hearing your feedback on implementation of this functionality. Thanks in advance!
—AK
Pinal Desai
supported this idea
·
-
415 votesplanned · 76 comments · Feature Suggestions » Plesk (general) · Flag idea as inappropriate… · Admin →Pinal Desai
supported this idea
·
-
502 votes
We have serious doubts this function can really increase server security:
1) Plesk has built-in protection against brute-force on login – it will lock the login form. So no one can try multiple attempts
2) Arbitrary login name adds very little guess-complexity to a proper password. If you have concerns for your login brute-forced – add another 5-7 characters into your password and feel safe.As changed login name is still very likely to be some sort of vocabulary word or derived from your other account name – this function would only give a false sense of better security. Your security strength is in complex password, not in a complex login name. If you have one good password, you don’t need to treat login as your “second password” – one good password is enough.
As for concerns that default password requirement is set in “weak”, that fail2ban module is not…
Pinal Desai
supported this idea
·
-
548 votes
Since Plesk Onyx you will be able to install memcache as a Docker container and configure http(s) proxy rule for it to map to your web app.
Docker and proxy rules are available in Plesk Onyx Preview already, you can try it here https://talk.plesk.com/threads/plesk-onyx-preview-and-feedback.337172/
SE
Pinal Desai
supported this idea
·
-
666 votesopen discussion · 115 comments · Feature Suggestions » Security · Flag idea as inappropriate… · Admin →Pinal Desai
supported this idea
·
-
753 votes
Would you mind to try Nginx caching in Plesk Onyx 17.8 Preview?
This would be very helpful to get your experienced feedback here http://www.surveygizmo.com/s3/4165754/Plesk-17-8-Preview
Pinal Desai
supported this idea
·
-
6 votes
Thank you for your input! We will consider this functionality in upcoming releases if it will be popular. Everyone, please continue voting for this feature if you consider it important.
—
IGPinal Desai
supported this idea
·
-
2 votes
Thank you for your input! We will consider this functionality in upcoming releases if it will be popular.
Everyone, please continue voting for this feature if you consider it important.
—
IGPinal Desai
supported this idea
·
-
5 votesPinal Desai
supported this idea
·
-
105 votes
Thank you for your input! We will consider this functionality in upcoming releases if it will be popular.
Everyone, please continue voting for this feature if you consider it important.
—
IGPinal Desai
supported this idea
·
-
83 votes
Thank you for your input!
You mean “Local repository on your workstation” mode (not “Remote Git hosting like GitHub or BitBucket”), right?
Everyone, please continue voting for this feature if you consider it important.
— rk
An error occurred while saving the comment Pinal Desai
supported this idea
·
-
291 votes
Thank you for your input! We will consider this functionality in upcoming releases if it will be popular.
Everyone, please continue voting for this feature if you consider it important.
— AY
Pinal Desai
supported this idea
·
-
36 votes
Thank you for your input. We will consider this functionality in upcoming releases if it will be popular.
Everyone, please continue voting for this feature if you consider it important.—
IGPinal Desai
supported this idea
·
-
74 votes
We are considering this, yes. Feel free to share in comments your ideas on which specific scenarios you would like to see there.
Pinal Desai
supported this idea
·
+1 to have this added so we can have multiple users per Git repo