Jorge
My feedback
-
40 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment Jorge
supported this idea
·
-
128 votes
Thank you for your input! We will consider this functionality in upcoming releases if it will be popular.
Everyone, please continue voting for this feature if you consider it important.
—
ETJorge
supported this idea
·
-
286 votes
Thank you for your input! We will consider this functionality in upcoming releases if it will be popular.
Everyone, please continue voting for this feature if you consider it important.
— AY
Jorge
supported this idea
·
-
93 votes
Thank you for your input! We will consider this functionality in upcoming releases if it will be popular.
Everyone, please continue voting for this feature if you consider it important.
—
IGJorge
supported this idea
·
-
59 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment Jorge
commented
+1
This is an example of several features that do not require so much votes to be considered essential for the control panel.
Jorge
supported this idea
·
-
171 votes
Thank you for your input! We will consider this functionality in upcoming releases if it is popular. Everyone, please continue voting for this feature if you consider it important.
—
IGAn error occurred while saving the comment Jorge
commented
Some features should not need so many votes in order to get considered as important. This is one of them.
Jorge
supported this idea
·
-
124 votesopen discussion · 29 comments · Feature Suggestions » Usability and UI · Flag idea as inappropriate… · Admin →
An error occurred while saving the comment Jorge
commented
Hello!
Could this feature has a little push to be considered?It was suggested 6 years ago ...
I think all of us agree that regardless of whether it has many or few votes, the importance of this feature is self-explanatory.
Jorge
supported this idea
·
-
355 votesopen discussion · 52 comments · Feature Suggestions » Plesk (general) · Flag idea as inappropriate… · Admin →Jorge
supported this idea
·
-
395 votes
Thank you for your input! We will consider this functionality in upcoming releases if it will be popular.
Everyone, please continue voting for this feature if you consider it important.
—
IGJorge
supported this idea
·
-
499 votes
We have serious doubts this function can really increase server security:
1) Plesk has built-in protection against brute-force on login – it will lock the login form. So no one can try multiple attempts
2) Arbitrary login name adds very little guess-complexity to a proper password. If you have concerns for your login brute-forced – add another 5-7 characters into your password and feel safe.As changed login name is still very likely to be some sort of vocabulary word or derived from your other account name – this function would only give a false sense of better security. Your security strength is in complex password, not in a complex login name. If you have one good password, you don’t need to treat login as your “second password” – one good password is enough.
As for concerns that default password requirement is set in “weak”, that fail2ban module is not…
Jorge
supported this idea
·
-
747 votes
Would you mind to try Nginx caching in Plesk Onyx 17.8 Preview?
This would be very helpful to get your experienced feedback here http://www.surveygizmo.com/s3/4165754/Plesk-17-8-Preview
Jorge
supported this idea
·
-
18 votes
Thank you for your input! We will consider this functionality in upcoming releases if it will be popular.
Everyone, please continue voting for this feature if you consider it important.
—
IGJorge
supported this idea
·
-
20 votes
Thank you for your input! We will consider this functionality in upcoming releases if it will be popular.
Everyone, please continue voting for this feature if you consider it important.
— AY
An error occurred while saving the comment Jorge
commented
+1
Jorge
supported this idea
·
-
178 votes
Thank you for your input! We will consider this functionality in upcoming releases, if it will be popular.
Everyone, please continue voting for this feature if you consider it important.
—
ETJorge
supported this idea
·
-
1,107 votesJorge
supported this idea
·
-
661 votesopen discussion · 115 comments · Feature Suggestions » Security · Flag idea as inappropriate… · Admin →
An error occurred while saving the comment Jorge
commented
+++1
Jorge
supported this idea
·
-
463 votesopen discussion · 21 comments · Feature Suggestions » Panel/Mail · Flag idea as inappropriate… · Admin →
An error occurred while saving the comment Jorge
commented
+1
Jorge
supported this idea
·
-
112 votes
Thank you for your input! We will consider this functionality in upcoming releases if it will be popular.
Everyone, please continue voting for this feature if you consider it important.— rk
Jorge
supported this idea
·
-
1,002 votes
Hi all, Thanks for your input, really appreciate this! As you know, in Plesk Onyx 17.8 we made a significant improvement that allows you to use several cloud storages or even SFTP for remote backups. In Plesk Onyx 17.9 we will continue to improve Plesk Backup Manager in general and Flexible Backup Scheduler Manager in particular.
Based on the initial description and comments I can highlight 3 scenarios in the scope of this request:
#1. Keep Daily & Weekly & Monthly backups at the same time: (Example: 2 weeks of daily backups + weekly backups by each Monday)
#2. Backup to different storages (like daily to FTP and monthly to Google Drive)
#3. Multiple Storages of the same type (like 2 different FTP servers)
ID in our Issue Tracker: PPM-1701
-DLJorge
supported this idea
·
-
1,512 votes
We hear you and see a clear demand for this feature.
I want to say that implementing these features requires a lot of investment, and in 2021 Plesk team keeps focusing on the delivery of other improvements (sad, but true).
We will back to the re-evaluation of these features at the beginning of the next year.
Please continue to share your use cases and requirements, and it would really helpful if you point to existing solutions that we can review and check before implementation.
Your feedback is important to us. Thank you, everyone.
—
AAJorge
supported this idea
·
+1
And please add comments on whitelisted IPs ...