Fabio Perri
My feedback
-
1,547 votes
We hear you and see a clear demand for this feature.
I want to say that implementing these features requires a lot of investment, and in 2021 Plesk team keeps focusing on the delivery of other improvements (sad, but true).
We will back to the re-evaluation of these features at the beginning of the next year.
Please continue to share your use cases and requirements, and it would really helpful if you point to existing solutions that we can review and check before implementation.
Your feedback is important to us. Thank you, everyone.
—
AAAn error occurred while saving the comment An error occurred while saving the comment Fabio Perri
commented
Hi dear Plesk Team,
Any news about the Plesk feature request for HA (High Availability) Cluster and LB (Load Balancing) Cluster ?
This feature request on Plesk Uservoice it is the most requested and voted in absolute, in fact it is in place number 1, have over 1237 votes, over 151 comments and was created on 31 December 2013 so over 7 years and 11 months ago (also on March 10, 2020 you also created a survey for this feature request) !!!
How is it possible that the Plesk Team failed to implement it in over 2890 days (almost 8 years) ?
I can understand that it involves a fair amount of work and many changes in Plesk but almost 8 years of time seems more than enough to implement this feature request, also considering that Plesk is not free and also costs a lot, you should offer more to your paying customers.
After nearly 8 years of waiting, over 1237 votes and over 151 comments, it would be much more serious of you to make it clear that you will never implement this feature request !!!
I look forward to receiving an official and definitive response from the Plesk Team here.
Thanks in advance for the support.
Fabio Perri
supported this idea
·
-
58 votes
Thank you for your input! We will consider this functionality in upcoming releases if it will be popular.
Everyone, please continue voting for this feature if you consider it important.
—
IGFabio Perri
supported this idea
·
-
42 votesopen discussion · 5 comments · Feature Suggestions » Panel/Mail · Flag idea as inappropriate… · Admin →Fabio Perri
supported this idea
·
-
49 votes
While we wish it as much as you do, this is not possible to deliver Docker at customer level at the moment as customers can gain root-level access through the Docker CT and it will be an ultimate security breach.
The only generic way to deliver such function is wrapping all containers of a customer into a sort of VM similarly to Kubernetes “pods”, but Plesk itself runs in VM commonly and cannot produce extra tier of VMs. So we are very much limited by Docker itself and we are exploring how we can overcome it.
If you wish to continue conversation, please join talk.plesk.com
Thank youFabio Perri
supported this idea
·
-
44 votes
Thank you for your input! We will consider this functionality in upcoming releases, if it will be popular.
Everyone, please continue voting for this feature if you consider it important.
— ES
Fabio Perri
supported this idea
·
-
47 votes
Thank you for your input! We will consider this functionality in upcoming releases if it will be popular.
Everyone, please continue voting for this feature if you consider it important.
As workaround you can use this KB article https://support.plesk.com/hc/en-us/articles/360002886854-Is-it-possible-to-create-scheduled-backup-tasks-via-CLI-API-
—
IGFabio Perri
supported this idea
·
-
51 votesFabio Perri
supported this idea
·
-
52 votes
Thank you for your input! We will consider this functionality in upcoming releases if it will be popular.
Everyone, please continue voting for this feature if you consider it important.
—
IGFabio Perri
supported this idea
·
-
45 votes
Could you explain why total subscription size is not enough? Why you would need a separate limit for mail content and web content?
UPD: reopened after new comments received
Fabio Perri
supported this idea
·
-
45 votes
Thank you for your input. We will consider this functionality in upcoming releases, if it will be popular.
Everyone, please continue voting for this feature if you consider it important.
—
IGFabio Perri
supported this idea
·
-
48 votesFabio Perri
supported this idea
·
-
46 votes
Thank you for your input! We will consider this functionality in upcoming releases if it will be popular.
Everyone, please continue voting for this feature if you consider it important.— rk
Fabio Perri
supported this idea
·
-
52 votesopen discussion · 9 comments · Feature Suggestions » Backup / Restore · Flag idea as inappropriate… · Admin →Fabio Perri
supported this idea
·
-
68 votes
Thank you for your input! We will consider this functionality in upcoming releases if it will be popular.
Everyone, please continue voting for this feature if you consider it important.
—
IGFabio Perri
supported this idea
·
-
48 votesFabio Perri
supported this idea
·
-
53 votes
Thank you for your input! We will consider this functionality in upcoming releases if it will be popular.
Everyone, please continue voting for this feature if you consider it important.
—
IGFabio Perri
supported this idea
·
-
47 votes
Thanks for your input! we consider this as a valid and clear feature request that is registered in our tracking system as PPM-2515.
There is no ETA at the moment, but we would really appreciate you voting for this request so that we can accurately assess its popularity relative to other features. Thanks in advance!Fabio Perri
supported this idea
·
-
52 votes
Thank you for your input! We will consider this functionality in upcoming releases if it will be popular.
Everyone, please continue voting for this feature if you consider it important.
—
AAFabio Perri
supported this idea
·
-
49 votesFabio Perri
supported this idea
·
-
48 votesopen discussion · 4 comments · Feature Suggestions » Plesk (general) · Flag idea as inappropriate… · Admin →Fabio Perri
supported this idea
·
Hi dear Plesk Team and dear IgorG,
Since my last message, another 8 months have passed about 240 days and unfortunately there is no update on your part and no news about it and for this reason I propose the same question that I already asked you 8 months, obviously updated on everything the time that you have still passed without doing anything while we customers in bulk continue to pay you a lot of money and to request this very important function but apparently you do not care at all the opinion of thousands of your customers who continue to enrich you without get no answer from you and in the meantime ...
Any news about the Plesk feature request for HA (High Availability) Cluster and LB (Load Balancing) Cluster ?
This feature request on Plesk Uservoice it is the most requested and voted in absolute, in fact it is in place number 1, have over 1369 votes, over 180 comments and was created on 31 December 2013 so over 8 years and 7 months ago (also on March 10, 2020 you also created a survey for this feature request) !!!
How is it possible that the Plesk Team failed to implement it in over 3130 days (almost 9 years) ?
I can understand that it involves a fair amount of work and many changes in Plesk but almost 9 years of time seems more than enough to implement this feature request, also considering that Plesk is not free and also costs a lot, you should offer more to your paying customers.
After nearly 9 years of waiting, over 1369 votes and over 180 comments, it would be much more serious of you to make it clear that you will never implement this feature request !!!
I look forward to receiving an official and definitive response from the Plesk Team here.
Obviously I invite all Plesk users and customers interested to make themselves heard and participate in this discussion in order to have an answer and some updates from Plesk !!!
This is the discussion link of the official Plesk forum:
https://talk.plesk.com/threads/ha-high-availability-cluster-and-lb-load-balancing-cluster-for-plesk.358980/
This is the link on the discussion of the official Plesk support site:
https://support.plesk.com/hc/en-us/articles/213931225-Does-Plesk-support-any-cluster-solutions-
Thanks in advance for the support.