Robin Labadie
My feedback
23 results found
-
8 votes
Thank you for your suggestion. We will consider this functionality in upcoming releases if it becomes popular. Everyone, please continue voting for this feature if you consider it important.
-- KvD
-
385 votes
Thank you for your input! We will consider this functionality in upcoming releases if it will be popular.
Everyone, please continue voting for this feature if you consider it important.
— AY
-
3 votes
Thank you for your idea. Could you please describe what exactly would be useful about hiding the DNSSEC option? What is the business case where this is needed and how does it improve the user<->system interaction?
-- PD
-
412 votes
-
430 votes
Thank you for your input! We will consider this functionality in upcoming releases if it will be popular.
Everyone, please continue voting for this feature if you consider it important.
— AY
-
428 votes
Thank you for your input! We will consider this functionality in upcoming releases if it will be popular.
Everyone, please continue voting for this feature if you consider it important.
—
IG -
446 votes
-
703 votes
-
13 votes
-
8 votes
-
394 votes
As UserVoice staff cleaned up the most of twisted voices, I’ve returning this suggestion to open discussion.
Everyone, please continue voting for this feature if you consider it important.
—IB
An error occurred while saving the comment -
58 votes
Thank you for your input! We will consider this functionality for the upcoming releases if it becomes popular enough.
Everyone, please continue voting for this feature if you consider it important.
—
IG -
224 votes
-
227 votes
-
244 votes
-
417 votes
This is a valid request, so we’ll look into it. There is no ETA at the moment, but we would really appreciate you voting for this request so that we can accurately assess its popularity relative to other features.
The original request contains a manual solution, so, we consider to automate it. Please, add a comment if your case will not be solved with that solution.
Thanks in advance!
— rk
-
169 votes
Thank you for your input! We will consider this functionality in upcoming releases if it will be popular. Everyone, please continue voting for this feature if you consider it important.
—
IG -
54 votes
Thank you for your input! We will consider this functionality in upcoming releases if it will be popular. Everyone, please continue voting for this feature if you consider it important.
The previous status update was done by mistake.
— AY
-
57 votes
Thank you for your input! We will consider this functionality in upcoming releases if it will be popular.
Everyone, please continue voting for this feature if you consider it important.
As workaround you can use this KB article https://support.plesk.com/hc/en-us/articles/360002886854-Is-it-possible-to-create-scheduled-backup-tasks-via-CLI-API-
—
IG -
536 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment It would be great to be able to have diifferent mailbox quotas as well. Say if a customer wants one 1GB mailbox and one 10GB mailbox. Currently, customers have control on the mailbox value, being limited by the max mailbox size therefore we cannot sell differently sized mailboxes.
@Lars & @Anonymous
Not even needed to symlink, you can just use a mount point in your fstab for that. :)
Totally needed in order to have a custom URL for custom webmails.