Júbilo Estudios

My feedback

  1. 28 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    5 comments  ·  Feature Suggestions » Mail  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Júbilo Estudios supported this idea  · 
  2. 18 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    8 comments  ·  Feature Suggestions » Migrations  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Júbilo Estudios supported this idea  · 
  3. 75 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    9 comments  ·  Feature Suggestions » Web / HTTP functions  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Júbilo Estudios supported this idea  · 
  4. 587 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    open discussion  ·  104 comments  ·  Feature Suggestions » Security  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Júbilo Estudios commented  · 

    Block 5.10.0.0 - 5.10.255.255 = 65,536 IPs. Is not a practical solution, china for example has 356,936,737 IPs. Even just blocking the IPV4 either, many attacks we receive come from IPV6 from Dubai for example.

    Júbilo Estudios supported this idea  · 
  5. 374 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    47 comments  ·  Feature Suggestions » DNS  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Júbilo Estudios commented  · 

    "Thank you for your input. We will definitely look into integrating DynDNS in our future releases" (2018 comment, today is 23/10/2020)

    Júbilo Estudios supported this idea  · 
  6. 5 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Feature Suggestions » Security  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Júbilo Estudios supported this idea  · 
  7. 36 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    5 comments  ·  Feature Suggestions » Security  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Júbilo Estudios supported this idea  · 
  8. 19 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    5 comments  ·  Feature Suggestions » Plesk (general)  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Júbilo Estudios supported this idea  · 
  9. 75 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    16 comments  ·  Feature Suggestions » Web / PHP  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Júbilo Estudios supported this idea  · 
  10. 10 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    2 comments  ·  Feature Suggestions » Docker  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Júbilo Estudios supported this idea  · 
  11. 461 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    60 comments  ·  Feature Suggestions » Security  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →

    We have serious doubts this function can really increase server security:
    1) Plesk has built-in protection against brute-force on login – it will lock the login form. So no one can try multiple attempts
    2) Arbitrary login name adds very little guess-complexity to a proper password. If you have concerns for your login brute-forced – add another 5-7 characters into your password and feel safe.

    As changed login name is still very likely to be some sort of vocabulary word or derived from your other account name – this function would only give a false sense of better security. Your security strength is in complex password, not in a complex login name. If you have one good password, you don’t need to treat login as your “second password” – one good password is enough.

    As for concerns that default password requirement is set in “weak”, that fail2ban module is not…

    Júbilo Estudios supported this idea  · 
  12. 666 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    108 comments  ·  Feature Suggestions » Web  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Júbilo Estudios supported this idea  · 
  13. 1,353 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    179 comments  ·  Feature Suggestions » Plesk (general)  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Júbilo Estudios supported this idea  · 
  14. 11 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    1 comment  ·  Feature Suggestions » Plesk (general)  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Júbilo Estudios supported this idea  · 
    Júbilo Estudios shared this idea  · 
  15. 511 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    47 comments  ·  Feature Suggestions » Web  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Júbilo Estudios supported this idea  · 

Feedback and Knowledge Base